they found that he was responsible for the collision. this was a he said she said trial. we had a huge amount of evidence about his state of mind and his physical and mental health before and after that accident, but we now know the jury found that gwyneth paltrow was not responsible. he was suing her for paltrow was not responsible. he was suing herfor $300,000, she countersued for $1, she has now been awarded that $1 in damages, and he will now be liable to pay the legal fees which will likely run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. now, a flurry of activity out here just a few moments ago, gwyneth paltrow left court immediately after the verdict. she didn t spike to speak to reporters. she walked past calmly as she has throughout the course of this trial and terry sanderson came out speaking to reporters and said that gwyneth paltrow has spoken to him on her way out of court and simply said i wish you well him and he said to her thank you. you well him and he said to her
compromised by foreign business interests. will: the key piece of evidence at the center of this investigation is hunter biden s laptop. he has hunter counter sue the owner of the delaware repair shop that first brought the laptop to light. he countersued john paul mcisaac for invasion of privacy, his lawyers say they can thread the needle that it isn t really hunter s but if they were you shouldn t have kept the data and disseminated that data. what is your reaction to his countersued? i m dubious of that. strikes me as an intimidation classic to get him to withdraw his suit. zoom out a little bit of a lawsuit would mean discovery and there s little appetite from the biden team to go into discovery with hunter biden in the middle of his reelection
bigger cultural conversation that we were having at the time. it was bow reform, about legislative reforms and renewing the violence against women act. did you worry, gosh, i would love to be the person weighing in on these cultural issues but that will stir this all up again? that is a great question and one that i wish was considered more seriously because it is important. when you wrote the op-ed, it was the height of metoo, legions of powerful men being canceled, losing their jobs. did you want that to happen to johnny depp? of course not. it wasn t about him. johnny depp disagreed and filed a 50 million dollar defamation lawsuit against her. good morning. good morning. she countersued, all which led to the recent showdown in court. i don t have to remind you that you have been found liable for defamation against johnny
a child in washington, d.c. understands. this is all very predictable. you trash the press. you call them enemies of the people. what do you think is going to happen? they will lose. you pick fights with everybody and everybody, david ignatius. we have tim kaine. go ahead. will fight you back. i guess, david, this is the fringe that is so frustrating. it s all so predictable. w we knew this was going to happen and donald trump is shocked that, hey, you put your hand on a stove it s going to get burned. it s that simple. one follows another. joe, i wrote this morning i m struck by the way in which trump s behavior is so similar to how he behaved as a businessman. if he got sued, if he got into a business fight, he countersued. he would counterattack. he would come back and put together a countersuit and hope to tie the whole thing up in litigation and spend so much