now. i am against their division of this lot. i think they still have options that they haven t used because they just don t want to. thank you very much. thank you. next speaker. good evening, commissioner. my name is noni. i am president of the small property commission of san francisco. the hughes are members of our organization, and they have asked me to appear. they definitely live in that house. i visited the property today. there are parking spaces all over the place. i saw two buildings facing two streets, and those buildings appeared to be totally unrelated to each other. there is a cute cottage on 19th street that sits in a sad state of repair, and it may continue so if they can t get a loan to rebuild it. there is no reason not to allow this to become two parcels. if it became two parcels, a bookkeeping procedure, there would not be any open space lost, no parking spaces lost, nothing lost. it will simply allow this property to become more livable. the people w
had an add angular shape to it. for those ronings and for the five findings that were not met, we respectfully request the board upheld the administrator s denial of the requested variance. thank you. commissioner peterson: could you put that vote back up? could you point out again the buildings on the lot? this is the building which fronts on pennsylvania, and this is further down 19th at 1120 19th. this is the building that was constructed post 1975 variance. commissioner peterson: and recently, a couple of years ago, the fourth floor was added? that s right. in 2007-2008, there was a request for a fourth floor. the department recommended several cut-backs in terms of side setbacks. the commission chose a different alternative, and that is the project that is built today. i am none clear. can i point back to that picture? yes. the back lot, is that the how with the roof, with the flue or whatever that is? that is correct. so it is completely different? and