putin s narrative that the russians are winning. and, oh, by the way, it will you know, it will bolster russian morality will probably unduly affect ukrainian morale. it could also affect support from europe and the united states. so while it is just a small tactical piece of ground, i think it has huge strategic implications. i think zelinsky understood this and i think it s the right call. how does ukraine win against an enemy that in the end of the day is sort of many, many times bigger? you re the defense budget is 10 times bigger than number of people putin can call in so much larger so i think winning looks like ensuring that russia doesn t achieve its goal . so when the invasion first started, of course, there were these putin s narrative was we re going to take kiev. we re gonna come in through harkey. you ve come up through crimea come in through the dawn box, and we will essentially take ukraine. well when that didn t work so well, then he moved the goalposts. and now it was
looks like ensuring that russia doesn t achieve its goal. so when the invasion first started , of course there were these mean putin s narrative was we re going to take kiev. we re gonna come in through harkey. you ve come up through crimea come in through the dawn box, and we will essentially take ukraine. well when that didn t work so well, then he moved the goalposts. and now it was about well, we re going to build the land bridge from donbass down to crimea, and now he is struggling to do that. so if the ukrainians can prevent the russians from actually building that land bridge. then i think what it does is it forces putin once again to move the goalpost, and frankly, sooner or later, failure is going to be on the radar for everybody that s watching this so they don t have to take back the dawn. boss they don t have to take back crimea. no, they d like to. what they ve got to do is prevent the russians from building that land bridge. and i do think they can do that. and do you thi
different tornadoes i ve covered, the moore, oklahoma tornadoes and felt similar to this in the sense the destruction was so wide. the path of the storm was 60 miles and 21 people lost their lives. the families that may not ever want to come back to this, may not want to call this home. and sandra, you mentioned the economic reality and that is the truth, this is a very poor community based off of the median cost of living here, and they, a lot of the people were struggling to begin with. the president likely to talk about these are the americans that had the least and now they have to give so much more. sandra. sandra: yeah, two of the hardest hit counties in that state, they were just completely, sharkey and humphries where so much of the agriculture was wiped out. sharkey poverty rate, 35%, and humphries, 33%, 19% overall for the state.