one-story addition that was over the garage. additionally, the appellate exceeded the scope of the building permit applications and expanded the building to the side, rear, and fraud without the benefit of a permit. in 2010, the appellate filed another permit, 4358, to legalize the condition of the subject property. the appellate did work extensively with the planning department to revise the design the appellant did work with the planning department. we set out narrow neighborhood notification. two reviews were filed. what went before the planning commission. the planning commission held several hearings on this item, as has been noted and then subsequently decided to take the review. they conditioned it to go back to the original permit from 1998, and that was a pattern that would allow them to restore the building to what was previously built, and it would correct the issue with the front and backed with the permit was issued in error, and the extension over the front,
to commemorate them, the amphitheater was designed. it turns out the friends of lafayette park and had it wrong. in 1962, they performed once at washington square park. the following year, the recreation and parks commission denied them the permit for for their performances fighting their act was obscene. ironically, this non-history is being commemorated at our park while one of the most important historical aspects, the holiday house, is not even getting a plaque. instead it is getting paid men and picnic tables. which brings me to one important piece of new information for the commission to consider. the apparent remnants of the holiday mansion were brought to my attention by local historian rand richards, author of three books on san francisco. the planning department does not seem to be aware that remnants of the house actually exist. this is the house. here is the cement footing that runs 55 feet. it is not known if it continues under the ground. it is covered by dirt a
fung, aye,. the denials are upheld with a vote of 4-0. president hwang: welcome back to the august 22, 2012 meeting of the board of appeals. we re calling item number seven. shannon gallagher. subject prieta 2101 washington street. a permit to alter a building. new plumbing fixtures, park improvements, lights, new retaining walls, and it. witt will start with the appellant. you have seven minutes. thank you. at one of three open committee meetings, it was suggested that the san francisco mind troupme e be honored. to commemorate them, the amphitheater was designed. it turns out the friends of lafayette park and had it wrong. in 1962, they performed once at washington square park. the following year, the recreation and parks commission denied them the permit for for their performances fighting their act was obscene. ironically, this non-history is being commemorated at our park while one of the most important historical aspects, the holiday house, is not even getting a plaqu
the professionals were told what to do and they did it. the winter these plans and through these plans and to these plans and now the yees are being blamed. we will have to go some to some form where evidence must be produced and the culprits to have been blamed for this misunderstanding can be brought forward and we can establish exactly how all this happened and whether or not the yees are entitled to compensation for the space that was lost. there was loose talk about what they did and did not get. they did not get the space under the house, it was taken away. that was never part of the agreement or the deal. no one has gotten up here and said that space under the house that was referred to was in fact given back to them. it was not. no one has gone up here and said when the lawsuit was settled, that space was taken into consideration. they were compensated for it. it was not. i was there. i negotiated the settlement. they were told one thing and handed something else. a