out of the supreme court breaking news about this, this drug it is called mifepristone. it is a pale about the size of an aspirin and it is the first of two pills used in the most commo form of abortion here in the united states. it s medication abortion it is safe it is effective. and it is significantly less invasive than a surgical abortion and if you have been following the news, you would know tha, am -appointed federal judge i texas ruled that despite thi drug being used safely for 2 years now, the fda was wrong t approve the drug and his ruling had the potential to take the drug off the market altogether. so, tonight s decision from th supreme court was pretty clear it means this will not happen, at least not yet the supreme court issued wha is known as a stay, meanin they are effectively blockin that texas judges decision while this case is appeale through our court system maybe even all the way back to the supreme court down the roa now, the lower court battle is c
have a certain privilege, an perhaps he feels he can do his client a lot of good no doubt, he may feel that i and there is some to trump being on afraid to go in there and play - for trump. but there is a reason why pres relations people usually are not involved in the substanc of policy making decisions o legal strategy decisions because they are reall involved in doing spin and are not involved in that substantive effort somebody like him seems to wan to do both and usually that s really ba idea let me ask you, sham, if can, about another development there s another trump matter obviously, there is this ongoing legal struggle here in manhattan. we learn tonight to th manhattan d. a. s office withdrew its appeal of a federal judges decision that former prosecutor mark pomerantz must testify to th house judiciary committee, basically paving the way for him to cooperate with the hous judiciary committee in tha
joining us now is former federal prosecutor and legal analysts sham who. sham, it s good to see you tonight, greatly appreciat your time. let s talk about that second revelation the fact that he was there for two days why do you think prosecutors i needed two days to interview mr. epstein epshteyn and how significant is the fact, that, as abc news was reporting, tha the special counsel himself, jack smith, sat in on a portio of that interview? i think it really highlight how important of a witness someone like epshteyn could be because he s right at trump side and, as he boldly asserted, he s fully aware of the efforts, with regard to the fraudulen electors, and sort o implicating rudy giuliani in that as well i think one thing to remembe about it is that it s such a unusual situation for a lawyer a legal adviser, to have his phone seized and the amount of time, as you