there s a shadow organization within the fbi. we intend to. we intend to, absolutely. we intend to find out what it is. that s why the american people have been learning more and more about the intractable bias in this investigation. they need facts to back it up and when they get them, you know where you re welcome to come on and make the case. right here. appreciate you taking the opportunity. thank you. more breaking news tonight. for you religious people out there who are christians, you know that i m right. and for those of you who don t, go google it. see what the immaculate conception is. shouldn t say it if you don t know what it means. president trump contradicts himself on immigration again. or to be fair, he seems to be articulating a different position. what he s saying now about citizenship for d.r.e.a.m.ers. we ve got a great debate about it. navarro versus schlapp, next. there s a vacation at the end of every week with hilton.
you made the analogy. how jesus was born. it s not how he was born. it was the conception. no it wasn t. it was mary s conception. the mothers. without original sin. not the conception of jesus. facts matter. if you ll make an analogy. know what you re talking about. you have to have a by basis. you know what you show. you have the release the memo. before you say there s a shadow organization within the fbi. we intend to. absolutely. we intend to fine out what it is and get the answers. they are learning a will the of suggestions from you. they need facts. when you get them, you know where you re welcome to come on and make the case. rite here. we appreciate you taking the opportunity. thank you. more breaking news.
with peter strzok, who was involved. he was removed. he was removed by bob mueller after the i.g. brought them out. in one of the exchanges, she says maybe it s time to have our first meeting with the secret organization, whatever she called it. the republicans seize odd that to say it is proof that a shadow organization exists in the fbi to undermine justice. well, that s ridiculous. first of all, she and strzok were sending e-mails back and forth with their personal opinions. and the opinions stated in those e-mails were the opinions of the majority of american people. they didn t like trump, they didn t trust him. that s the proof that we need. those are the questions that have to be asked. the is the investigation biased not whether the personal opinions of some people who work in the investigation. how do you get that answer?
you switch the r and d and context from this discussion about the texts to what we know about russia and collusion and activity. and you sound the same. when it s about russia you don t care what the basis is. you don t believe it. you don t want to investigate it s silly. you have a phrase between loves. you don t know the context but ready to say there s a shadow organization at the fbi. and the irony that the only reason you know about the texts is not because you looked it up. not because republicans figured it out. you didn t have a source on it. this was done internally. by the same fbi you can t trust. it was subpoenaed by devin nunes. the inspector general had them. the report independent agent. and when mueller was told what happened? when he was told about the texts. he moved on them. he took them off strozk. page was gone. so he couldn t.
one? in this whole back and forth, is it clear i m saying we re going to wait for the inspector general report who has interviewed people, doing their job for months now? but you work there and you interact with these people all the time. has anybody ever mentioned something like this to you? has it ever come up with as a concern? i think this is an unproductive line of questioning. the inspector general is investigating this. we ll have a report and six committees of congress have thousands of text messages now. a lot of americans have seen these text messages and understandably disturbed by what they re seeing. the rule of law should be free of bias from i keep asking because i feel like you re walking a line of not upsetting certain political partisans but also representing the interest of the doj. not an easy line to walk. i think i would ask you if there s a shadow organization within the fbi, you would know if you ve seen any proof outside of what the ig