i don t remember i m pretty sure it was a d.c. postmark. but i d have to double-check the envelope. so just to understand, i really appreciate your breakdown of the meticulous reporting you ve done. are you basically saying that what you got originally was a kind of an unsourced item that you didn t attach a ton of credibility to, and over the coming months all these other pieces fell into place that made you think this letter was actually predominantly true? yes. i mean, basically, frankly, as we were doing the reporting and you mention the seychelles story. the reason we figured out the seychelles meeting was in part because of that line in the letter that i was trying to figure out, was there a meeting in the third country? we all heard the story about the prague so-called prague meeting that took place, which was a lot earlier. and this letter referred to a meeting that they were discussing, holding a meeting, this is a meeting taking place december 1st, december 2nd, in
sure it was a d.c. postmark, but i d have to double-check the envelope. so just to understand, i really appreciate your breakdown of the meticulous reporting you ve done. are you basically saying that at you got originally was a kind of an unsourced im at you didn t attach a ton of credibility to, and over the coming months all these other pieces fell into place that made you think this letter was actually predominantly true? yes. i mean, basically, frankly, as we were doing the reporting and you mention the seychelles story. the reason we figured out the seychelles meeting was in part because of that line in the letter that i was trying to figure out, was there a meeting in the third country? we all heard the story about the prague so-called prague meeting that took place, which was a lot earlier. and this letter referred to a meeting that they were discussing, holding a meeting, this is a meeting taking place december 1st, december 2nd, in which they discussed wanting to have a
i don t remember i m pretty sure it was a d.c. postmark. but i d have to double-check the envelope. so just to understand, i really appreciate your breakdown of the meticulous reporting you ve done. are you basically saying that what you got originally was a kind of an unsourced item that you didn t attach a ton of credibility to, and over the coming months all these other pieces fell into place that made you think this letter was actually predominantly true? yes. i mean, basically, frankly, as we were doing the reporting and you mention the seychelles story. the reason we figured out the seychelles meeting was in part because of that line in the letter that i was trying to figure out, was there a meeting in the third country? we all heard the story about the prague so-called prague meeting that took place, which was a lot earlier. and this letter referred to a meeting that they were discussing, holding a meeting, this is a meeting taking place december 1st, december 2nd, in wh
was the letter handwritten or printed and where was it postmarked from? it was typed. i don t remember i m pretty sure it was a d.c. postmark. but i d have to double-check the envelope. so just to understand, i really appreciate your breakdown of the meticulous reporting you ve done. are you basically saying that what you got originally was a kind of an unsourced item that you didn t attach a ton of credibility to, and over the coming months all these other pieces fell into place that made you think this letter was actually predominantly true? yes. i mean, basically, frankly, as we were doing the reporting and you mention the seychelles story. the reason we figured out the seychelles meeting was in part because of that line in the letter that i was trying to figure out, was there a meeting in the third country? we all heard the story about the prague so-called prague meeting that took place, which was a lot earlier. and this letter referred to a meeting that they were discu