there s other witnesses also asserting bogus privileges from attorney general sessions to donald trump jr. to roger stone. and we are telling them, we re telegraphing we don t care that we re not going to do anything about it. i think it could have just a destructive effect in the future. there will be future investigations. and we re setting a really dangerous precedent. his behavior before this committee has been unique, right? yes. certainly though he has unified democrats and republicans in wanting to hear from him. but what concerns me is, the test is to whether the republicans are serious about taking the necessary steps toe compel his testimony. but here s what concerns me, chris. he is represented by same attorney who is representing don mcgahn. this is interesting because mcgahn is the white house counsel who is a serting executive privilege. so you have an attorney representing one client hosteling another client that they can t testify.
and you know, hayes done an admirable job considering the circumstances he s under where devin nunes comes and goes mostly as a disruptive force. he wasn t there today. we should have moved peeledly to hold him in contempt. there s other witnesses also asserting bogus privileges from attorney general sessions to donald trump jr. to roger stone. and we are telling them, we re telegraphing we don t care that we re not going to do anything about it. i think it could have just a destructive effect in the future. there will be future investigations. and we re setting a really dangerous precedent. his behavior before this committee has been unique, right? yes. certainly though he has unified democrats and republicans in wanting to hear from him. but what concerns me is, the test is to whether the republicans are serious about taking the necessary steps toe compel his testimony. but here s what concerns me,