After back-to-back oral arguments this week, the Supreme Court appears reluctant to hand down the kind of sweeping ruling about liability for terrorist content on social media that some feared
the company is operating legitimately would not be liable even if they know that bad people are doing bad things down the road. the key here said seth waxman is when post material actually are part of planning an attack that twitter or the other social media platforms would know about, a much deeper connection. now, the other thing that the families say is that, you know, the algorithms that rank and make recommendations, that that is a enough for liability, and that s why they ve brought this case. it s interesting. you know, you step back and you the justices did not seem persuaded by the families, i have to say here. that they were troubled by some of this material, but they did not want to go so far as what the families were arguing, and i think, you know, compared to what we were talking about yesterday and today about some of these issues, the justices are really struggling to take a
Justices parse Twitter s role in Islamic State attacks | Courthouse News Service courthousenews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from courthousenews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Supreme Court justices searched Wednesday for a way to determine when large social media companies used by terrorists cross the line into aiding and abetting them in their attacks.