whether to hand this material over. and ultimately i m sure he will have been given the advice that whatever is within that could potentially be embarrassing that withholding it and being seen to withhold it would look far worse. 50. being seen to withhold it would look far worse. ., ., , ., far worse. so, the attention is now on rishi sunak, far worse. so, the attention is now on rishi sunak, it far worse. so, the attention is now on rishi sunak, it is far worse. so, the attention is now on rishi sunak, it is on far worse. so, the attention is now on rishi sunak, it is on the - on rishi sunak, it is on the government. what are they going to do? are they going to risk legal action? ~ y . ., , do? are they going to risk legal action? ~ . ., , ., action? well, officials have said the are action? well, officials have said they are considering action? well, officials have said they are considering the - action? well, officials have said| they are considering the position
position is that messages of a personal nature shouldn t be passed over, that it should be the government lawyers that go through that and decide what is unambiguously irrelevant. baroness hallett rejects that argument, or has done today and saying it is her inquiry to determine what is relevant to the lines of investigation. d0 relevant to the lines of investigation.- relevant to the lines of investigation. relevant to the lines of investiuation. , ., ~ investigation. do you think we ll see le . al investigation. do you think we ll see legal action investigation. do you think we ll see legal action or investigation. do you think we ll see legal action or will - investigation. do you think we ll see legal action or will there - investigation. do you think we ll see legal action or will there be | see legal action or will there be some fudge? baroness hallett is not the kind of woman you mess with, to be honest, is she? ida. the kind of woman you mess with, to be honest, is she?