benefits. payroll. compliance. trinet. people matter. this program in 2019, and told the story that she has been telling, and retelling on her cross-examination in court in manhattan in a civil lawsuit against donald trump for allegedly raping her in the 1990s in the dressing room of a new york department store. there was nobody there and the door was open, they usually keep their dressing room doors locked. so, he was like this, i walked in, he shut the door behind us, and threw me up against the wall and kissed me. i could not believe the. the next thing he did is put his shoulder against me, and then his hand went, i was
deliver your emails. the new york times reports, federal prosecutors have also been drilling down on whether mr. trump and a range of political aides knew that he had lost the race but still raised money off claims they were fighting widespread fraud in the vote results according to three people familiar with the matter. led by special counsel jack smith, prosecutors are trying to determine whether mr. trump and his aides violated federal wire fraud statutes, as a race as much as $250 million through a political action committee by saying they needed the money to fight to reverse election fraud, even though they had been told repeatedly, there was no
cross-examination because if this case was being conducted in a way would expect with other people, donald trump would take the witness stand in his defense, and say none of that happened. that testimony will not exist in this case, and so, the only thing the trump defense had to try to get an alternative story out there is to cross examine e. jean carroll. and as you say, that cross-examination is now over, which is to say the trump case has competed, the trump defense has completed the most important part of its defense, which was a cross examination of. well that s right, but there s a little bit more than that, would you are over, and over again in the final arguments of trump s lawyers, which is that it is only carole, there was no report to the police, there was no dna evidence, and that will be lightly brought to the jury s attention even though it is supposedly out of the case.
am a member of the silent generation, women like me were taught and trained to keep our chance up and not complain. the fact that i never went to the police is not surprising for someone my age. we were not ever trained to call the police, ever. i would rather have done anything then call the police. at the beginning of today s session donald trump s lawyers made a routine motion with a mistrial, which was routinely, and immediately denied by the judge. the defense will also file a standard motion to dismiss the case when e. jean carroll s tsai completes the presentation of the plaintiffs evidence. such motions are routinely filed, and routinely denied in the civil lawsuits. joining us now is faith gay, former prosecutor for the eastern district of new york. thank you very much for joining us tonight, i know you ve been following this testimony more closely than most of us. what i have taken from the courtroom, and the coverage is
ideal figures to cooperate against higher ups, including donald trump. harry, another prosecutorial detail in wire fraud. donald trump kept asking for the money, claiming, i need this money to pay the lawyers who are handling these cases. the money was not used for that. does the fact that the money was not actually used for paying those lawyers. is that part of the fraud? you bet. look, fraud is simple, it is a lie that you know, and the parties suggested wires you can always show that in federal jurisdiction. so he just tells a lie, and there is some suggestion that in fact, there was this didn t even exist, and smith has developed evidence that the committee didn t, that there were two different consultants hired by the campaign, that trump knew at least about one, who said this is all malarkey.