And we wanted to come here in support of fair mitigation of the issues brought about by the taraval muni. Changes that take into account the residents, the muni riders and the merchants. We are just one of Many Community businesses that are affected by the changes happening as a result of the muni island implementation project. There are many variables to consider. One of them is there are parking needs in the lower taraval zone that have not been completely seen at this point. There are four new businesses that have not opened yet. And many that are just recently opened. All of these will require parking and will benefit from the many muni riders that come to the area. One of the businesses is also quite large who spoke earlier, the northeast medical services. Also, the entire block of parking along taraval between 45th and 46th will soon be removed. Thats in addition to whats already been removed. Any parking studies at this point are not a true representation of what is to come. The
Time restricted zones advised to put in. We strongly support revisiting the angled parking idea, once the full impact of all these changes is complete and the need for parking changes. The opening of ocean beach p. T. In its Current Location was based on the amount of parking available in the area. And this was never disclosed to us before acquiring the space, all the changes that were going to come about as a result of the muni changes. All we can hope for is the m. T. A. Board take into account all involved and open to the ideas while taking into account the merchants, residents and the muni riders. Thank you. Thank you, mr. Harriman, next speaker, please. Paula katz, followed by peggy deets and lynn miller. Hello. Im paula katz with safe our l taraval stops. I hope you have taken the time to read the many emails you have received because many l riders who cant make it here today have poured their hearts out explaining losing their stops will hurt them. I hope you have also read the
Of vladimiritic putin discusses russias influence in the u. S. And other countries. Washington journal is next. Returning to the Legal Framework that covered the president rom clintons announcement in 1996 to 2015 is not going to destroy the internet. It is not going to and the internet as we know it. High the fcc chair a jeep pai reversing regulations from the Obama Administration, known as Net Neutrality. Ahead on the washington journal, we will begin with your calls and comments, your reaction, and mean for you. All eyes on Congress Next week with the expected vote on that republican tax bill, but new concerns this morning from the hill. Com. Obstacles emerge as the gop races to the tax finish. We will be talking about all of these, but we want to get your reaction to the secs fcc cs repeal of Net Neutrality. If you support the measure, call us at 202 7488000. If you oppose, 202 7488001. We want to begin with what a of what Net Neutrality is and the impact of yesterdays 32 decision.
Our focus, Net Neutrality. Yesterdays fcc decision. We want to welcome randolph may, the president of the free state foundation, which is what . Free market think tank, freemarket think tank. Host and chris lewis, with a group of the foundation of Public Knowledge . We want to give you a sense of what is happening outside the fcc yesterday, as inside the commissioners were deciding the threeto ruling. [video clip] is it any wonder they want to shut it down, silence it, and stop it . Are we shocked . . Shocked . No. Are we going to let them get away with it . No. Post some of the demonstration outside of the fcc. Access isrnet overturned by the fcc. What you heard outside in this headline, randy may, is it accurate . Mr. May no. Really, what happened yesterday was going back to the type of fromnet regime that we had the beginning of the regulation of the internet until 2015. We had a return to what we called a light touch regulatory regime. In 2015, the Previous Commission imposed publi
Patients need to be dropped off and many are taken with someone who has driven them who comes to the appointment with them. We agree muni riders shouldnt exit the muni [bell] thank you very much. Lance harriman, paula katz, followed by peggy deets. Hi, im lance harriman, i will just continue with what mary was saying. Where were we . So if muni stands by its statement that all the options have been looked at and islands are not negotiable, seems a compromise would be to remove the stops to restore some of the parking. My question, is it possible to continue with the research for other options. Think about maybe a block sign that comes down off the back of a muni or Something Like that. If thats not the case, the most logical option would be, if you remove a stop would be to remove the one in the middle. The limited parking that will be left, that is left at this point and will be left after the changes need to be protected in some way from the commuters that drive from the other parts