Constitution you took an oath you have no choice you have to move forward with impeachment and allow the process to take place because if you dont its going to open the door up to where every politician can now seek whatever they want from countries outside the United States and if our elections are corrupt enough believe me after this happens you might as well throw it to the wind it will be so much quickly de watkins what are your thoughts on these impeachment proceedings finally i guess moving forward in the house. You know i was i was 2nd be more shocked or i like i was i wish there was like a bill of the that would allow me to believe that i was experiencing some type of a surprise but donald trump has been an ally and a crook before he even thought about politics he was a law and a corrupt throughout his whole campaign he was a lie and a crook throughout his whole entire. So you know weve removed this law is this very screwed up thats what im sitting back and im waiting for that
Definitely thank you so much. Gets news in a 247 with the r. T. App on your mopar your next update from us is say in just under half an hour were off to washington d. C. Next though for todays watching the hawks. Readings and salyut asian. Well our watchers its on us those are the immortal words tweeted out by a system editor of the New York Times news desk Katie Roberts when the news broke that the u. S. House of representatives welp initially begin drafting impeachment charges against United States President Donald Trump u. S. Speaker of the house nancy pelosi led the charge at a press Conference Thursday morning who comparing trump to a despotic tyrant and then laid out the president s supposed crimes against america the facts are uncontested the president abused his power for his own personal political benefit at the expense of our National Security by withholding military aid and crucial of the Office Meeting and exchange for an announcement of an investigation into his political
About all right i want to start with everybodys thoughts on the drawing up of imprisonment charges by the house on president from jesse will start with you well the 1st thing i want to get to that strikes me is now trumps come forward saying hes gone 250 more 1000000 in defense spending for ukraine and yet at the same time theyre going to take 700000 people in our own country off of food stamps so its more important for us to send weapons around the world than to feed our very poorest people in america now i got that off my chest that now will go to impeachment and. That irks me but anyway i dont see theres a choice because you know like myself i took an oath to protect the constitution and the bill of rights now if the president has knowingly violated. The constitution you took an oath you have no choice you have to move forward with impeachment and allow the process to take place because if you dont its going to open the door up to where every politician can now seek whatever they wa
The cass review, as its called, came out last week, and it recommends a new approach for clinicians. This is a Polarising Subject for some people. So, what mightjournalism do differently in how it covers it . Hannah barnes is a former bbc producer who investigated some of the uks gender Identity Services for the corporations newsnight programme. She went on to write a book about it. I asked her when she first started her investigation. First came across it at all in 2017. I was off on my first Maternity Leave and there was a piece in the times Byjanice Turner Which was talking about this really rapid increase in the referrals of Teenage Girls to gids the gender Identity Development service and she had spoken to two clinicians who worked at the service. It wasnt really a Big Sort Of Whistle blowy piece but they had talked to her and said what theyd seen and itjust i thought it was very interesting, but i was off and, you know, spending time with my baby. And there was also a documentary
The pentagon for its part watching the political infighting going on has been trying to pre position weaponry where it can so that those weapons can head to ukraine, head to troops on the ground sooner rather than later. Potentially within days as opposed to weeks. That doesnt rule out the prospect of further political infighting despite the fact that congresswoman nancy pelosi had called to sign off on the bill for ukraine. We know that it had been facing resistance from the republican party. They had wanted ties to strict immigration laws, Stricter Border security with the us mexico border. That particular vote failed. They needed a two thirds majority so that did not come to pass. Instead what you saw with the ukraine bill is that more republicans voted against it than actually voted in favour. We know that Republican Congress woman Marjorie Greene has signalled her intention to potentially oust the Republican House speaker mikejohnson over this filing a motion to vacate. She said s