Decision on internet regulation. Also known as Net Neutrality. Joining us to discuss this issue, gigi sohn who served as Senior Advisor to fcc chair tom wheeler for several years, and is going with the Georgetown Law Institute for technology. And Patrick Holly was Senior Vice President at u. S. Telecom, a trade association here in washington, d. C. Before we put on our advocates at, give us a lawyers assessment of what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled. Guest what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled was that the fcc decision and the restoring of the net freedom order was permissible and essentially completely upheld. Its a big win for consumers, a big win for innovators, big win for investment in broadband in america. Essentially what the court said was that the fcc decision to regulate broadband and Internet Access as an Information Service as a module has been for the last 20 years outside of a two years under the title ii order was permissible. Its consistent with Supreme Court preceden
This week on the communicators, discussion of the recent d. C. Court of appeals decision on internet regulation, also known as Net Neutrality. Joining us to discuss this issue gigi sohn, former fcc chair tom wheelers adviser, currently with the Georgetown Law Institute for technology. And the Senior Vice President at u. S. Telecom, trade Association Patrick halley washington, d. C. Give us of lawyers assessment of what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled. The d. C. Court of appeals ruled that the secs decision was permissible in the industry storing Internet Freedom order. It was completely upheld. It was a big win for consumers and innovators and a big win for broadband in america. Essentially, with the court said was that the secs decision to regulate Broadband Internet access as an Information Service as it largely has been for the last 20 years outside of a twoyear period. Under the title to order, was permissible. It is consistent with Supreme Court precedent and this d. C. Circuit j
We will hearent next in case 22451, local right enterprise vers raimdo mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, this case commercial fishing his heart. Space on board the vehicle vessels are tighand margins e tighter still. Therefore, for my client having to carry federal observers on board is a burdenbuhaving to pay their salaries is a crippling blow. Congress recognizes much by strictly limiting the circumstances in which domestic Fishing Vessels can be battle with monitoring costs and capping emat 2 3 of the value of the catch. The agency showed no such rerat requiring monitoring of 50 of the trips and a cause of 20 of eiannual returns. Nonetheless the cot deferred to the agency because it blew view the stat signment. There is no justification for giving the tide to the government. Both the apaand constitution of what his principles ca for de novo review asking only whatisthe best reading of the statute. Asking instead is the st ambiguous is fundamtay misguided. The whole point w
In case 22451, local right enterprise versus raimondo. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, this case commercial fishing his heart. Space on board the vehicle vessels are tight and margins are tighter still. Therefore, for my client having to carry federal observers on board is a burden, but having to pay their salaries is a crippling blow. Congress recognizes much by strictly limiting the circumstances in which domestic Fishing Vessels can be battle with monitoring costs and capping them at 2 3 of the value of the catch. The agency showed no such restraint requiring monitoring of 50 of the trips and a cause of 20 of their annual returns. Nonetheless the court deferred to the agency because it blew view the statue assignment. There is no justification for giving the tide to the government. Both the apa and constitution of what his principles call for de novo review asking only what is the best reading of the statute. Asking instead is the statue ambiguous is fundamentally misgui
Suicide prevention hotline. This is just under two hours. Good morning and welcome to the april 2024 open meeting of the federal Communications Commission. Madam secretary, will you please introduce our judges for today . Good morning to you, and good morning, commissioners. For todays meeting, you will be presented with two items and five Enforcement Actions for your consideration. First, you will consider a second further noticed of proposal making that would propose to require the implementation of one or more geo routing solutions for wireless calls to the 988 suicide and crisis lifeline, to make sure calls are routed a geographic location rather than the area code and exchange associated with a Wireless Phone. Second, you will consider a declaratory ruling, order, and order on reconsideration that would reestablish the commissions authority to protect consumers and safeguard the fair and open internet by classifying Broadband Internet Access Service as a Telecommunications Service