Supreme Court Customs Act | Importer s Subsequent Import Bill Be Discarded If Undervalued To Previously Imported Identical Or Similar Goods: Supreme Court Case Title: M/s Global.
NOMINAL INDEX Nikita @ Najrana And Another vs. State Of Up And 3 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 66 M/S Sahbhav Engineering Ltd. Ahmadabad Thru. Authorised Representative Mr. Pramod Dave vs. U.P..
Ramesh vs The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Gst on 28 February, 2024 indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Challenging a Bombay High Court order on January 10 that dismissed its plea, Vedanta said the impugned levy is a tax and not a fee since it did not receive any special benefit, either individually or as a member of a class, which the Supreme Court has held to be a requirement for a levy to qualify as a fee in the case of Jalkal Vibhag Nagar Nigam vs Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Co.
The Allahabad High Court has rejected the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act in appeals filed under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The Court held that.