The comments in the document should be acknowledged, either comment received or this is where you can find this information further, so that people, when they take the time to engage in public projects, that their comments are responded to, and they think that theres a consideration taken in the public involvement. Operator thank you, caller. Chair peskin thank you, mr. Pilpell. That was a good comment. Are there any other members of the public for this item . Operator there are no other Public Comments. Chair peskin all right. Seeing no further Public Comment, Public Comment is closed, and this is an information item. As i se as i said earlier, this is an item that has been going on and off for the last two decades, and i think many of us thought this was the time to resurrect this item that started under the leadership of louise moscovitch many years ago. There has been no provenation about anything. We want to do it right, but we want to go about, albeit difficult during covid, a ro
We will get into that. Let me say a little bit about scott. Welcome, scott. Many of our viewers know scott from his very long and successful and productive tenure and engagement with the National Park. He has been retired for a little more than 10 years or a little less than 10 years, excuse me. Geez, actually six years. Peter one thing john and i have discussed with many of our guests is interpretation on Civil War Battlefield parks. We also talked about partnerships with academics. We have seen with many of our guests, including our guest on thursday, nina silver, one of the first historians who came to the park and had conversations about ways to broaden the interpretation of gettysburg. Time and time again, john have noticed these connections between academics and public historians. Cant then conclude there is this great gap or golf between the two sides. I thought we could open by howng you reflect upon battlefield interpretation has changed over time during your career. And then,
2020 meeting of the Police Commission. I think its probably fair to say that we all have our minds a little bit elsewhere tonight given everything thats going on in the world, and this being probably the consequential election of our lifetime. Were glad to be here with you all and we will all take the pledge of allegiance tonight with maybe a little more awareness of whats going on in the world. I will ask everyone to place their hands over their heart so we can say the pledge. [pledge of allegiance]. Thank you, and as always, if i could ask for the commissioners to mute their microphones. If you would like to be heard, just put your name in the chat box. Members of the public who are dialing in, i would ask you to please mute any background noise so that we can hear you and there is no feedback. The dial in number is [indiscernible] 0001, access code 146424 [indiscernible]. You will have two minutes for Public Comment. Please call the roll. [roll call]. You have quorum. [indiscernibl
40 billion in mortgagebacked securities. They say the path of the economy will be connected to the path of the virus in the statement. One interesting note at the end. Mary dailey, head of San Francisco reserve president mad to cast her vote as alternate. Minneapolis president Neal Kashkari is on paternity leave. He was into the at the meeting. The birth of their second child happened this week. We think, we believe this is the first time a Voting Member missed a vote because of paternity leave. Back to you, charles. Charles that is an interesting tidbit a lot to go through here. Meantime, folks it is another monster session in the market which yesterday had the best ever postelection session. There should be no question that the worry of a blue wave was the main reason for selling last week. But now the question, have investors moved from abject fear to unbridled optimism a little too fast . Moreover with megagrowth leading the way again, what is the best place to be positioned for th
Prices and the economy depends on the course of the virus the committee will maintain its purchases or increase to smooth market funding it repeats for the second time that it seeks inflation moderately above 2 . This is a carbon copy of the last statement i counted seven words changed and none of them really substantial or meant to convey any particular meaning i think that reflects the big changes. Jim was saying last time exceeding the 2 inflation goal and theity si itdesire not to mo many waves while the country counts votes in this president ial election. The other dissenter did not attend the meeting due to the birth of his second child. Congratulations to Neal Kashkari absolutely. Well spend half an hour dissecting those seven words what do you think of jims point, which is the absence of stimulus may have put the fed even more under a spotlight to do even more absolutely. I think thats true. I think the fed will feel pressure to do more, but it creates an interesting quandary,