And were coming forward inaudible having individuals plead guilty to charges shows a lot. I think as we continue doing those kind of cases and building those cases we will see results. We have asset forfeitures that will be coming so i can foresee more things happening. Were currently working with the fbi right now. Commissioner turman. I move that we, the ask the board of supervisors to authorize the police to retroactively accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of 200,000 from the california Emergency Management agency. Second. First we have to have Public Comment. Any Public Comment . Seeing none, all in favor say aye. Please call line item 5. Line item 5, Public Comment on all matters pertaining to item 7 below, closed session, including Public Comment on vote whether to hold item 7 in closed session. Motion with reference to the closed session matters, ladies and gentlemen these are disciplinary matters involving police officers. They are protected by the california constitu
good morning and welcome to the local Agency Formation commission as a joint meeting with the Public Utilities commission. My name is chair avalos, john avalos chair of the lafco. I am joined by other lafco members, commissioner olague and commissioner pimentel. This is a joint committee so i will pass on the mic on our chair from the Public Utilities commission. Yes, art torres member of puc and other members. Thank you very much for being here. We make a very legionary and strong quorum on this rainy day. Okay. And of course our general manager is here as well, har an kelly and the staff of the puc. Thank you. I want to thank sfgtv for their work broadcasting this meeting, and madam clerk if you could chair with us your announcements. Please make sure to silence all electronic devices. Speaker cards and any documents should be submitted to the clerk. Okay. Do you want to call the roll . You call the roll on puc. Yes. President torres. Here. Commissioner. Here. Commissioner moran co
Conduct requirement came out of the experience that pg e and marin energy had when marin energy launched its program so the code of conduct puts certain restrictions on both parties, the utility, in our case pg e and on us as a cca. Broadly speaking it prohibits either party from misleading customers. It requires that any expenditures that pg e incurs to actively market against the program cannot be reimbursed by rate payers and shared by shareholders. It allows pg e to answer questions and educate about their program and how it compares to our program. It requires both parties to work with the California Public Utilities Commission Public Advisors office to create a comparison document that would be made able by all parties on the two Program Offerings. So that gives you some of the key elements. And the code of conduct you said is in the process of being approved or is approved. So a proposed decision was drafted and sent out for comment by the cupuc staff. It then by state statute s
Lot. I think as we continue doing those kind of cases and building those cases we will see results. We have asset forfeitures that will be coming so i can foresee more things happening. Were currently working with the fbi right now. Commissioner turman. I move that we, the ask the board of supervisors to authorize the police to retroactively accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of 200,000 from the california Emergency Management agency. Second. First we have to have Public Comment. Any Public Comment . Seeing none, all in favor say aye. Please call line item 5. Line item 5, Public Comment on all matters pertaining to item 7 below, closed session, including Public Comment on vote whether to hold item 7 in closed session. Motion with reference to the closed session matters, ladies and gentlemen these are disciplinary matters involving police officers. They are protected by the california constitution and the California Supreme Court decision of kochley may i have a motion . Were
Program when it was initially proposed by pg e would have pg e offering to san franciscans an opportunity for 100 renewable product that is greening up their portfolio to using Renewable Energy credits, so they have placed a proposal before the california puc for their agreement. Parties are engaged in asking questions, testimony has been filed. The cupuc had scheduled hearings in december for the proposal, but those hearings on hold in order to allow parties to talk further and potentially arrive at a settlement. There really isnt active settlement discussion under way right now. We expect that may happen in january, and if you play out that process we think that maybe july or august of 2013 we will know what shape the program that pg e has proposed has been authorized by the cupuc. Pg e would then as i understand it from their filings need to go through a solicitation process to hire a Third Party Contractor to perform the Program Implementation and were thinking it would probably be