Again given that this is on a puc its my understanding under the rules that are in place this would not require a permit. Quick question. Do you have verizon or at t . I wish i had verizon during the Power Outages because it sounds like it was working better. [laughter] thank you. We are now moving onto Public Comment. How many people are here for Public Comment . If you could line up against the wall so we can keep the process moving i would appreciate it. Everyone has two minutes each. First speaker, please come up. First speaker. Thank you. Im liz buchanan. I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public Health. One great solution is to set a maximum effective radiated power limit from the face of the antenna shroud at 40mili watts by adding the article to article 25. For Wireless Telecommunications facility that is installed in the public rightsof
Ignores wisdom and interrupts the essence of lifes pulsation within the universe and eternity. Just to support the appeal stance behind article 25 of the 1996 fel1996 telecommunicationst can stand behind a precautionary principle resolution and have faith in the recent Court Decisions in recent to win their day in court for all of us. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. My name is page hudson. Im happy to be here tonight. I am have prepared comments so im just going to speak to you from my heart as a very concerned citizen who has been very steeped in this process of trying to educate our communities here in california and across the nation about the dangers of small cell closerange cellular towers. I often ponder why were still having this conversation when there are over 2,000 peer review studies that show the dramatic impact that even lower levels of three and four g are having on our population. Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe wh
We have the analyst with San Francisco public works and we expect carlo short and chris buck, forester from San Francisco public works. The board requests that you turn off all phones and other electronic devices. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. Appellates, permit holders, and respondents are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. Members of the public who are not affiliated with their parties have three minutes each and no rebuttal. Please people into the microphone. The board reserves the right to not call an item after 10 00 p. M. Please speak to board staff during a break or after the meeting or visit the office if you have additional contents. This meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv. The video is available on our website and can be downloaded from sfgovtv. Org. If you intend to testify at any of the proceedings and wish to have your testimony given weight, please stand and say i do after you have been sworn or affirmed. Do you swe
Ill try to. Joe duffy, dbi. The permit under appeal is a commencement of work not started under a previously permit, soft story retrofit under 34b engineering criteria including plywood walls, simpson walls. This is a renewal permit. So back in 2016 went through a process took them about a week to get the permit. And it was maybe 1,000 valued for the soft story retrofit. They got the permit and didnt start the work. The permit got approved until the contractor was chosen until the building got sold. And then the permit could have been issued in which case the plot wasnt but the permit gets issued, 360 days to complete the work. I dont know what happened in between that time. But then when they came back in 2019 as you heard the option is a renewal permit which is appealable which is why we have an appeal. The extensions on the permits, this permit would have extended for a number of years. We just dont they have to write a letter to say why they start the work. So that didnt happen. Th
Principle resolution and have faith in the recent Court Decisions in recent to win their day in court for all of us. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. My name is page hudson. Im happy to be here tonight. I am have prepared comments so im just going to speak to you from my heart as a very concerned citizen who has been very steeped in this process of trying to educate our communities here in california and across the nation about the dangers of small cell closerange cellular towers. I often ponder why were still having this conversation when there are over 2,000 peer review studies that show the dramatic impact that even lower levels of three and four g are having on our population. Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe which is of course glioblastoma and brain tumors. As a cancer survive or myself, my son is a cancer survivor and my friend is battling glioblastoma and her doctors have advised her it was a result of wireless routers and c