Against him to be dropped. Broadcasting live direct from our studios in moscow this is R T International im sean thomas in the glad. Right now residents of lampedusa have staged a protest against the arrival of new migrants officials on the Southern Italian island state that the situation is sustainable and some locals are taking matters into their own hands by trying to stop newcomers from disembarking. They cannot but we dont understand whats going on here in london do so this is a disaster for us the migrants arent leaving because theyre left alone were all in this together the early hours of sunday morning around 370 people arrived in the port of lampedusa on board a fishing boat now they received an angry reception from locals. Here were here for peace we just want the Illegal Migrants to go back because were fed up tonight when produce assess enough while local government officials and lampedusa are saying the island can cope no more with the sheer number of people that are arriv
Hes, 16, 78. Hernandez. Mr. Chief justice merkels report. When this case was spurs argue to this for two years ago. Counsel responded, and council for the United States, were both asked for the petitioners would have if Sergio Hernandez was standing on u. S. Soil when he was shot and killed by respondents . Well said yes. It wasnt for the score today, is whether in action is nonetheless foreclose. Because in this case. Sergio ascending on a few phoenix of the Mexican Border at the time he was shot. For two reasons we believe that it isnt. First. The fortuitous of where a victim is standing does not affect trigger any of the special factors. Identified by responders or the United States. Most importantly. It is difficult to see how Foreign Relations could be a special factor for including a bevin suit here. If it wouldnt have precluded acclaim if he wasnt standing just a few feet away. Moreover the governments would dramatically undermine u. S. Foreign relations in diplomacy is, belied
I did get the shot today for reasons that dont matter. I got it yesterday after the doctor suave my nose. He confirmed fear that test, that i have influenza. Im a highly knowledgeable person, i could not even know that war was a test to confirm i had a flu. And what strayed it was. We need more education here at home for ourselves, about the basics of where the science is right now. The game in the shot again. The flu shot. Even though the season is going to end. I cant use any of the other stuff. Because im too far into the infection. I just wanted to say, we need education at home and abroad. Got a barbara, thank you. That is a great idea. I really like it. Getting those short psas and animations out there, its something we have done with our members and activists around the world. Getting in front of millions of people is really tough. I did want to comment that this is one of the things that other partners on the ground due to tell communities there is going to be a vaccine day. Th
Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court. When this case was first argued to this court two years ago, counsel for respondent and counsel for the United States were asked if they were standing on u. S. Soil when he was shot and killed. Both said yes. The question before this court today is therefore whether the sacks nevertheless foreclosed because in this case, sergio was standing a few feet to the mexican side of the border at the time he was shot. For two reasons we believe that it isnt. First, where the victim is standing does not in fact trigger any of the special factors counsel, identified by the respondent or the United States. Most importantly it is difficult to see how Foreign Relations could be a special factor concluding if it wouldnt have been the claim if he had been standing a few feet away. It is belied by the long history of successful tort claims against federal Law Enforcement officers including cases in which the victim was a foreig r er harmed on foreign soil. No
Isnt. First the fortuity of where the victim is standing does not trigger any of the special factors counsel and hesitation identified by respondent or the United States, most importantly its difficult to see how Foreign Relations could be a special factor precluding here if it wouldnt have precluded devons claim had sergio been standing a few feet away. The governance assertion that permitted petitioner suit would dramatically undermine us Foreign Relations in diplomacy is belied by the long history of successful court claims against federal Law Enforcement officers including as in the avalon cases in which the victim was a foreigner formed on foreign soil. The Court Awarded damages and the diplomatic sky did not fall nor did that territoriality cut against the different rabbit remedy here not only with respondents standing on us soil but he could not have known in that instance where the bullet would land or the nationality of anyone it might hit and more importantly for petitioners