comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Sergeant van buren - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Ninth Circuit Limits CFAA to Digital Breaking and Entering, Finds LinkedIn Likely Has No CFAA Claim Against Web Scraper | Goodwin

On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed a California district court’s order preliminarily enjoining LinkedIn from denying hiQ.

Leave The Gate Up Or Leave It Down : The Supreme Court s Recent Decision Marks Changes In The Landscape Of Cybersecurity And Privacy In Corporate America - Technology

Van Buren v United States (2021) | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Supreme Court Narrows Federal Anti-Hacking Law to Exclude Enforcement Against Those Who Use Otherwise Authorized Access for Improper Purpose There is a well-worn legal maxim that hard cases make bad law. In deciding Van Buren v. United States today, the Supreme Court was faced with the opposite problem: bad laws[i] make hard cases. Specifically, in a 6-3 decision, the Court found that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ( CFAA ) does not extend to an individual s accessing information over the internet for an improper purpose, so long as the individual would be entitled to access for a proper purpose. There s no question that interpreting the opaquely-worded CFAA forced the Court to choose between two bad options, with a parade of horribles on both sides; it chose the option that clearly decriminalizes everyday behavior (but also would allow abusive use of access that individuals have solely for work purposes).

Supreme Court Prohibits Use of Federal Anti-Hacking Law Against Those Who Use Otherwise Authorized Access for Improper Purpose | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

In Van Buren v. United States, the Supreme Court faced the difficult task of determining whether the opaquely-written Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) would apply to situations in which a person who was authorized to access information for work purposes had accessed that information for improper reasons.  In one of Justice Barrett’s first opinions, the six-justice majority found that it would not.  Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, dissented because he believed it should. The Van Buren case began when a financially-troubled sergeant in the Cumming, Georgia police department befriended a known criminal.  Sergeant Van Buren decided to leverage that friendship by asking for a loan (falsely claiming it was to pay off medical bills).  But his friend wasn’t all that friendly – he went to the county sheriff’s office and reported that Sergeant Van Buren was shaking him down.  The FBI got involved and ultimately created a sting opera

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.