Violence d. G. O. And the deaf and hard of hearing which is coming up for a vote later this month. But you should know that we were meeting on the d. V. Domestic violence d. G. O. For four years before this, before the new process was put into place, and so those meetings were not happening without sfpd, those were meetings with the d. P. A. , the Domestic Violence consortium and other shake holders and sf stakeholders and sfpd for four years, and we could not get this to the commission. Now were starting over, or theres a chance to start it over in this new process, so we support this resolution. Also, the deaf and hard of hearing, which we talked about a month ago, thats been worked on at the table for two years. Every day that sfpd does not have these updated d. G. O. S, san franciscans are in jeopardy. This must happen. I also signed onto a letter that was not available to the public that really delineated the process from bay area legal aid. We were honored to sign onto it, and we
A question for clarification on this issue, i had a clarification. So there was detailed letters from the d. P. A. With the line item at, like, line edited revision. There was also letters from the bay area legal and the d. V. Consortium. And somehow, they werent identified i dont know whats the right word, kbut there were people concerned about this resolution. They were filed under 30day correspondence with the commission. People were looking for them, and they didnt know there was input from all of these different groups. Some criticism, and some requests for modifications, and the input. Just for the agendas sake, i wonder why this wasnt identified under the resolution . Why was it just, like, 30day correspondence . Im concerned about the way it was listed in the agenda. Im not sure giving people notice that there was a lot more information regarding this resolution. Vice president taylor commissioner elias or hamasaki . [inaudible] Vice President taylor im sorry. Commissioner hama
Including d. P. A. And the commissioners assigned commissioner brookter and commissioner dejesus to work on this together so we can turn it around quickly and implement the changes. So thats the last slide. If you have any questions for me, im happy to answer them for the commissions consideration. Vice president taylor yes. Commissioner hamasaki . Commissioner hamasaki yes, chief, youre saying that this amendment needs to go to meet and confer . So i know theres going to be further discussion about this, but yes. We as our processes go, any d. G. O. Policy change, bulletin, those before now, went to d. H. R. For review to see if that triggered a meet and confer based on advice from d. H. R. And from the City Attorneys office. It still goes through that process, except miss choi and miss preston do it now as members of the department. Like every d. G. O. Or bulletin, they review it, and they give us advice on whether these policy changes trigger meet and confer. The advice we were give
NICHOLAS Yarolfalchuw, who has sued Police Sgt. John Cabrera, and Police Officer Daniel Fitial in federal court for unlawful arrest, has also filed a complaint against them and the CNMI