it will help us serve the veterans who have bravely served us. and it will ensure funding for an important effort such as disaster relief, infrastructure, and building on our work to fight opioid abuse and drug addiction. this bill is the product of extensive negotiations among congressional leaders and the white house. no one would suggest it is perfect, but we worked hard to find common ground and stay focused on serving the american people. first and foremost, this bipartisan agreement will unwind the sequestration cuts that have ham strung our armed forces and jeopardized our national security. secretary mattis said, quote, no enemy in the field has done more harm to the readiness of our military than sequestration.
important efforts such as disaster relief, infrastructure, and building on our work to fight opioid abuse and drug addiction. this bill is the product of extensive negotiations. among congressional leaders, and the white house. no one would suggest it is perfect but we worked hard to find common ground and stay focused on serving the american people. first and foremost, this bipartisan agreement will unwind the sequestration cuts that have hamstrung our armed forces and jeopardized our national security. secretary mattis said, quote, no enemy in the field has done more harm to the readiness of our military than sequestration. for years my colleagues on the senate armed services committee, led by chairman john mccain,
that, when it came to people they were monitoring. should that have been enough for us to trigger surveillance into him and if that s the case, how much more resources do we need? number one, i would set aside budget cut that s are going to devastate the fbi, cia and nsa. sequestration cuts are not only gutting the military. they re gutting the fbi. so if i were president, i would set the cuts aside. i would reinstate the nsa program as robust as possible within the constitutional limits. but more than anything else, if you get nothing else out of this interview, the source of the problem is in syria. raqqah is the headquarters of isil, which is a lethal terrorist organization now army. if you don t go after them over there, they re going to hit us over there, and there s no substitute for that in my view. is there any new regulation on the purchase of firearms by anybody on the no fly list or anything else that you would support? gun control is not part of a tragedy to defeat ra
facebook page, the equivalent of that, when it came to people they were monitoring. should that have been enough for us to trigger surveillance into him and if that s the case, how much more resources do we need? number one, i would set aside budget cut that s are going to devastate the fbi, cia and nsa. sequestration cuts are not only gutting the military. they re gutting the fbi. so if i were president, i would set the cuts aside. i would reinstate the nsa program as robust as possible within the constitutional limits. but more than anything else, if you get nothing else out of this interview, the source of the problem is in syria. raqqah is the headquarters of isil, which is a lethal terrorist organization now army. if you don t go after them over there, they re going to hit us over there, and there s no substitute for that in my view. is there any new regulation on the purchase of firearms by anybody on the no fly list or anything else that you would support? gun control is n
ideology more than a bomb. i am an internationalist. i want to help others, not just kill terrorists, but i can tell you there s a sense of urgency that the president does not possess, that there is a 9/11 in the making. i just came back from iraq. it is a matter of time until we get hit by isil, not some lone wolf attack but a hardened terrorist coming here to hit us hard if we don t hit them first. are there more resources you want to give the fbi? if the fbi yes. and do you think that if somebody like essentially the way law enforcement has described this, syed farook maybe had liked a facebook page. it was the equivalent of that, and when it came to people they were monitoring. should that have been enough for us to trigger surveillance or an investigation into him and if that s the case, how much more resources do we need? number one, i would set aside all these budget cuts that are going to devastate the fbi, the cia, and the nsa. sequestration cuts are not only