has been bad, but you at the nfu in the united kingdom say that you still support, despite the overwhelming evidence that it is environmentally extremely harmful, why do you do that? well, let s start with soil first. every farmer that i represent will say there is no more better investment they can make them into their soils, and a recent survey be dead, 75% of them wanted to be measuring the baseline of where we are at now which is fantastic. aha, baseline of where we are at now which is fantastic. which is fantastic. a quarter of all farmers which is fantastic. a quarter of all farmers could - which is fantastic. a quarter of all farmers could not - which is fantastic. a quarter| of all farmers could not care less about the quality of the soil? ., . , less about the quality of the soil? ., ., , ., ..,, soil? no. that is not the case at all. that soil? no. that is not the case at all. that is soil? no. that is not the case at all. that is the soil? no. that is not the case a
that it is environmentally extremely harmful. why do you do that? well, let s start with soils first. every farmer that i represent will say there is no more better investment they can make than into their soils, and, indeed, a recent survey we did 75% of them wanted to be measuring the baseline of where we are at now, which is fantastic. what you mean 25%, a quarter of all farmers, could not care less about the quality of their soil? no. that s not the case at all. that s the implication of what you just said. well, if you had ten years ago, if you had said, do you want to know how much carbon is in your soil? very few would have actually understood. carbon back then was nothing. what i am saying now is the value of carbon and the importance of sequestering more carbon is really resonating, and they want to know much more. the point you make on the neonicotinoids we would lead the world in sustainable production of sugar beet, and the neonicotinoids
versions. we are seeing it out of season, we are seeing it for kids that were sequestered that were masked that did not get exposed to regular viruses. so i m not of the philosophy keep your kids away from other kids. i think exposure to germs wash your hands, of course, well hydrated, watch for temperatures, be on the lookout for behavioral change, yes. but sequestering, no. sandra: dr. siegel, appreciate you joining us on all of that. a lot to watch out for especially as we approach the deepest part of the flu season. thank you very much. and john, we have been reporting on this the past couple of weeks how many doctors have weighed in to say they believe kids are more susceptible to a lot of this because they were kept indoors and away from kids for so long, were not building up the immune system, exposing their bodies and respiratory systems to germs. john: and the point you made a moment ago why are we relying on china to the precursors to the drugs, the debate in the
dealing with this right now. here she is. he was a perfectly healthy little boy, this is the first time he ever got sick. we were told pretty much do not take him out for three months after because he is that much more susceptible of catching anything. sandra: can you add to that for anybody listening, grandparent, a parent who might be having a child dealing with this respiratory illness. she was told not to take her otherwise perfectly healthy boy out for three months after recovering from this because he is that much more susceptible to catching something. what is your message on this, dr. siegel? well, i think that that i don t want to say anything about the specific case because i don t know the child. i think the overreaction of shutdowns and sequestering kids keeps them from being exposed to viruses they usually see. the reason we have the rsv outbreak usually see it by the time they are two, every child and they get mild
the middle and we re going to have to invept some ways of finding threats that are out there and prohibiting and sequestering them from having firearms. there s more mental illness in the u.s. than anywhere else in the world, it s just they have access to gun. to that point we re going to air here in the united states as well but all around the world as well and those outside this country do not understand the ease of gun access and the lack of rules on things like concealed carry. there are no rules enmany states, teenagers buying weapons like ar-15s at 14, of course more legal to have a beer. the rest of the world shakes their head. yeah, i can understand that. i don t think i could adequately explain it to somebody who hasn t lived in the united states and learned learned what our culture is like. i can t explain pickup trucks.