karl rove told you that it wasn t true, that he was not a source. he lied to you. he allowed you to repeat that lie to the press. matt lauer asked him about it this morning. let s just play that clip. on september 29th, 2003, on october 7th, 2003 and on october 10th, 2003, scott mcclellan, the press secretary for the white house went before the media and said in no uncertain terms, karl rove had nothing to do with giving her name. i didn t know her name. i didn t give her name. bob novak got it from someplace else. i m not clear are you splitting hairs here? did you know that scott mcclellan was giving information that was not factually correct? it was accurate. it was accurate. i did not give her name. her name was given to bob novak by under-secretary of state richard armitage, a fact that nobody in america knows for three years. and when they find it out in august of 2006, it s a ho hum. the washington post writes an expull ka tory editorial saying why didn t we know wit
he outted cia agent valerie plame. karl rove told you that it wasn t true, that he was not a source. he lied to you. he allowed you to repeat that lie to the press. matt lauer asked him about it this morning. let s just play that clip. on september 29th, 2003, on october 7th, 2003 and on october 10th, 2003, scott mcclellan, the press secretary for the white house went before the media and said in no uncertain terms, karl rove had nothing to do with giving her name. i didn t know her name. i didn t give her name. bob novak got it from someplace else. i m not clear are you splitting hairs here? did you know that scott mcclellan was giving information that was not factually correct? it was accurate. i did not give her name. her name was given to bob novak by richard armitage. when they find out in august 2006 it s a ho hum, the washington post writes an
lie to the press. matt lauer asked him about it this morning. on september 29th, 2003, on october 7, 2003 and on october 10th 2003, scott mcclellan, the press secretary for the white house, went before the media and said in no uncertain terms karl rove had nothing to do with giving her name. i didn t know her name. i didn t give her name. bob novak got it from someplace else. i am not clear did you know scott mcclellan was giving out information that was not factually correct? it was accurate. i did not give her name. her name was given to bob novak by undersecretary of state richard armitage, a fact that nobody in america knows for three years. when they find it out in august of 2006 it s a ho-hum. the washington post writes an exculpatory editorial saying why didn t we know before and it s no big deal. do you think you owe scott mcclellan any kind of apology for what he stood and said to the media on those three occasions? no. scott mcclellan, i knew that rove was t
wasn t true, he was not a source. he lied to you, he allowed you to repeat that lie to the press. matt lauer asked him about it this morning. let s just play that clip. on september 29th, 2003, on october 7th, 2003 and on october 10th, 2003, scott mcclellan, the press secretary for the white house went before the media and said in no uncertain terms, karl rove had nothing to do with giving her name. i didn t know her name. i didn t give her name. bob novack got it from some place else. did you know scott mcclellan was giving information that was not factually correct? it was accurate i did not give her name. her name was given to bob novack by bob armitage. when they find out in august 2006, it s a hoe hum, the washington post writes an editorial saying, wasn t why didn t we know about this before, and it s no big deal? do you think you owe scott mcclellan any kind of apology for what he said to the media on