several months later they camp in a letter. they want to know what happened in that time period? i think they have a right to know that. bob: same period of time you are talking about this going on, darrell issa is going to be drip, drip, drip, leaking stuff as he normally does on his committee staff, leak stuff to do damage to the president of the united states. you re wrong dana: as opposed to people bob: yes, they did! the last conversation [over talk ] eric: briefing and summary of document. that s what they offer. bob: in the past by the way, why should they have the documents. eric: you think the documents would contain more or less information than what the d.o.j. decided? bob: do you think executive should get everything issa has written to his staff? wait a minute. answer my question. eric: this is protecting the president. between date the d.o.j. denied the original denial letter of february 4, and retracting it of september 2 of 2011, president obama
several months later they camp in a letter. they want to know what happened in that time period? i think they have a right to know that. bob: same period of time you are talking about this going on, darrell issa is going to be drip, drip, drip, leaking stuff as he normally does on his committee staff, leak stuff to do damage to the president of the united states. you re wrong dana: as opposed to people bob: yes, they did! the last conversation [over talk ] eric: briefing and summary of document. that s what they offer. bob: in the past by the way, why should they have the documents. eric: you think the documents would contain more or less information than what the d.o.j. decided? bob: do you think executive should get everything issa has written to his staff? wait a minute. answer my question. eric: this is protecting the president. between date the d.o.j. denied the original denial letter of february 4, and retracting it of september 2 of 2011, president obama