nation is facing the most serious internal attacks on the frontal and institutional structures that define a democracy. since the pulitzer s were introduced a century ago. precisely to counteract problematic, authoritarian tendencies throughout the society. that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting which went to the washington post in new york times for quote, relentlessly reporting coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election. and it s connections to the trump campaign, the president elect s transition team, and his eventual administration. that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually lead the pulitzer boards to open two separate independent investigations into the awarding of those prizes. this week, the pulitzer board announced the results of those investigations,
for the most outstanding journalism of the year, and they delivered this warning. on the political fronts, i think, it is clear that the nation is facing the most serious internal attacks on the fundamental values and institutional structures that define a democracy. since the pulitzer s were introduced a century ago. then precisely, to counteract problematic authoritarian tendencies, throughout the society. now that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting, which went to the new york times and the washington post for quote, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election and its connection to the trump campaign, the presidents elects transition team, and his eventual administration. that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually lead the pulitzer board t
problematic authoritarian tendencies throughout the society. now, that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting which went to the new york times or and the washington post, for quote relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election,ru and its connectionso the trump campaign, the president-elect transition team, and his eventual administration. now that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually led the pulitzer board to open two separate independent investigations into the awarding of those prizes. and this week, the pulitzer board has announced the results of those investigations, and here is part of what they said. no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that subsequent to the con fe
patients, so say a case of sepsis, when you have a woman who comes in, her water is broken, she is infected and started to become febrile and we start to see the sepsis continuing, her organs start to shut down, at what point is she nearly dead enough under this bill that we could intervene? it s not clear. and if we make the wrong decision, that s for all of us, ten years in jail, and $100,000 fine. so those of white house have spent our whole lives trying to care for people are putting our lives, our livelihoods on the line to do what we feel is right. and what about the anesthesiologist? who is going to be willing to do that procedure given that there isn t clarity in these laws? given that the legislature hasn t protected the decision-making that happens when seeing a doctor and for the patient? and this has a chilling effect. it already has a chilling effect. this is to protect the life of the mother. what is the life of the mother?
scrub techs, we have nurses, we have anesthesiologist who help us provide the care for patients. in a case a step, this is a woman who comes in the waters, broken she s, infected she starts to become in for a brawl, we start to see sepsis continuing. herders as a shutdown. i will punish you nearly dead enough under this bill, that we can intervene? it is not clear. and if we make the wrong decision, that is ten years in jail, for all of us, and 100,000 dollar fine. so we are putting our own. those of us who spent our whole life trying to care for people, putting our lives, our livelihood, on the line. to do what we feel is right. and what about the anesthesiologists? who s gonna be willing to do that procedure given that there isn t clarity in these laws. given that the legislature hasn t protected the decision-making that happens between a doctor and her patient. so this is gonna have a chilling effect, already has a chilling effect, and it is scary. this is to protect the life of a m