that s a monday. okay. and how long would the state like to respond to the motion, the sentencing motion? could we have two weeks, your honor? you may, and that day would be, zack? february 14th. okay. and mr. frank, i think that the aggravating factors, we do the blakely on a unitary basis so no further evidence would be required, correct? that s correct, your honor. so could you submit your brief on the aggravating factors, how much time do you need on that? two weeks, your honor. okay. and the defense would need okay. and mr. kramer, could you tell them what the dates are.
that s a monday. okay. and how long would the state like to respond to the motion the sentencing motion? could we have two weeks, your honor? you may. and that date would be, zac? february 14th. okay. and mr. frank, i think that the aggravating factors, we did the blakely on a unitary basis, so no further evidence would be required. correct? that s correct, your honor. so, could you submit your brief on the aggravating factors, how much time do you need on that? two weeks, your honor. okay. and the defense would need two weeks after that. okay. and mr. kramer, could you tell them what the dates are? why don t we do them all on the 31st then?
generate 31st, that is a monday. okay. and how long would the state like to respond to the motion, the sentencing motion? could we have two weeks, your honor? ema. and that would be? february 14th. mr. frank, i think the aggravating factors we did the blakely on a unitary basis, so no further evidence would be required, correct? that is correct, your honor. so could you submit your brief on the aggravating factors? how much time do you need on that? two weeks, your honor. okay. and the defense would need okay. mr. cramer, could you tell them
about a week and a half ago the washington post filed a motion with the federal court in washington, d.c. that was handling a criminal case of president s campaign chairman, paul manafort. and that motion from the washington post called on the judge in the manafort case in d.c. to release unredacted filings and transcripts from manafort s case. so that the washington post and by extension the american people could get a gander at those documents. specifically the post motion called for unredacting a whole bunch of materials from manafort s case related to how he broke his plea deal when he repeatedly and the judge ruled intentionally lied to prosecutors. the motion also called for the release of an unredacted version of the sentencing motion on manafort that was filed with the court. large parts of it looked like
manafort and wikileaks founder, julian assange. and whether the penthouse offered to putin could be bribe bribery. we have this report that could drop any moment. bob mueller filing a sentencing motion on mike flynn, who pled guilty a year ago, an issue back in the news with these reports that trump was secretly pursuing funding from a yes, sanctioned russian bank. flynn is one of the people long linked to russia, sat next to putin at a 2015 dinner. you can see it there. he received ten s of thousands f dollars for the event and then denied any connection with russia. were you paid any amount? you d have to ask the folks i m asking you.