court. there s always the supreme court. i find it a tough sell, but ever since the 1973 roe v. wade decision when the republicans who are anti-abortion discovered that the power over abortion resided in the united states supreme court, they have never, never lost their focus on the supreme court, which is to say the senate and the presidency. no, they haven t lost that focus. and if you think about it, i mean for people who are against abortion, who believe that abortion is murder i do not share that view, but for people who do believe that, then obviously the supreme court is of supreme importance because that s where abortion rights were recognizedn this country. and that extends to other conservative issues as well. but i think they re all, you know, in a sense riding that
but i think they re all, you know, in a sense riding that wave that began with roe v. wade. this latest decision as maya pointed out also, seems to be wildly inconsistent with the gay rights decision recently from colorado in which case they specifically looked at the intent of one of the commissioners who decided the case against the plaintiff, discriminatory intent, and said there the baker doesn t have to make the cake. and in this case they refused to look at the president s clear intent to discriminate against muslims, which he proclaimed time and time again. so, maya, to your point about the rewriting of your executive order three times does not remove the original intent. it seems to have removed it for the majority of the justices. well, this is what s
yet to be a presidential contender in a way that he should. and his performance was fine in the first debate. but it didn t people nodded yes but they didn t then vote for him. that s a challenge for marco to figure out what s the missing ingredient here? i don t know either. ed it cruz very bombastic humself. how do you assess his chances? cruz is doing something very clever. cruz is in a sense riding right next to trump. the fact that cruz invited trump to come to the u.s. capitol today to he oppose the iranian deal together, we will see. cruz is a very, very smart man. and in the absence of trump would have been the natural tea party candidate and maybe in the absence of carson the natural evangelical candidate. the problem he has got is both those guys are now bugger than he is. and he hasn t quite yet figured out how to get past them. scott walker, governor of wisconsin hasn t caught on yet, has he? no. and it s a little bit of a surprise. i have known scott for a lot ye
but he hasn t broken through yet to be a presidential contender in a way that he should. and his performance was fine in the first debate. but it didn t people nodded yes but they didn t then vote for him. that s a challenge for marco to figure out what s the missing ingredient here? i don t know either. ed it cruz very bombastic humself. how do you assess his chances? cruz is doing something very clever. cruz is in a sense riding right next to trump. the fact that cruz invited trump to come to the u.s. capitol today to he oppose the iranian deal together, we will see. cruz is a very, very smart man. and in the absence of trump would have been the natural tea party candidate and maybe in the absence of carson the natural evangelical candidate. the problem he has got is both those guys are now bugger than he is. and he hasn t quite yet figured out how to get past them. scott walker, governor of wisconsin hasn t caught on yet, has he? no. and it s a little bit of a surprise. i