can t agree what the statutes provide? statu they can t agreete who hasprovi. the power to classify the can t agree what the role of the archives are when you have disagreement, the one thing that s clear in every liberal and civil libertarian should support me and you on this. u ce you cannot have criminal charges without the kind ofthat certainty that s lacking in this area. now, can they bring a civiltheyb suitri? can they try to get them into.d all right. that s up for dispute. criminal charges, not up for dispute. yor u. this case was over tapes involving bill clinton s in an interview that he had done greg. p fogeorge w. bush s white hous there was a report iney los newsweek had lost twenty two million emails. nista the obama administrationti settd settled lawsuits over missing we bush. white house emails and letters reveal that obama and his foundation kept classified documents abandoned in a furniture warehouse.
but if you look at the macro picture, in the peace process, picture, in the name process, the americans actually sought a regime change, and when they took their citizens to the kabul airport, they stopped supporting the afghan state and that tipped the balance of power in favour of the taliban. it was a conspiracy. you seem to ignore a basic truth in over two decades, the americans ploughed tens of billions, maybe $80 billion or $90 billion into afghanistan, they hoped they were building a credible, coherent government, but after what happened in august last year, it was clear that you and ashraf ghani and others had built no meaningful loyalty to the armed forces of afg ha nista n. between the public and the government, there was nothing but mistrust about the levels of corruption, and you surely have to take the blame for that? i do take the blame where
but if you look at the macro picture, in the peace process, the americans sought a regime change, and when they took their citizens to the kabul airport, they stopped supporting the afghan state and that tipped the balance of power in favour of the taliban. you seem to ignore a basic truth in over two decades, the americans ploughed tens of billions, maybe $80 billion or $90 billion into afghanistan, they hoped they were building a credible, coherent government, but after what happened in august last year, it was clear that you and ashraf ghani and others had built no meaningful loyalty to the armed forces of afg ha nista n. between the public and government, there was nothing but mistrust about the levels of corruption, and you surely have to take the blame for that?
picture, in the peace process, the americans sought a regime change, and when they took their citizens to the kabul airport, they stopped supporting the afghan state and that tipped the balance of power in favour of the taliban. you seem to ignore a basic truth in over two decades, the americans ploughed tens of billions, maybe $80 billion or $90 billion into afghanistan, they hoped they were building a credible, coherent government, but after what happened in august last year, it was clear that you and ashraf ghani and others had built no meaningful loyalty to the armed forces of afg ha nista n. between the public and government, there was nothing but mistrust about the levels of corruption, and you surely have to take the blame for that?