Her husband likes the valley of issue. China is moving approach successfully launches into space surf olga, as well as the land on the moons fall side, and eventually returned to us with a load of samples. The feel welcome to the program must protest in georgia, have entered the 3rd week of thousands of people take to the streets to denounce a bill that could threaten media, freedom and de right over the countries hopes of joining the European Union protest as opposed to a bad, what many and causing a russian law as moscow use a similar legislation to cub independent news organizations and groups critical of the crime that the new law would require. And jose and media groups that receive more than 20 percent of the funding from abroad to register as pursuing the interest of a foreign power. The you in the us of georgia to trump the legislation. Or lets go straight to georges capital. Now where we can join that correspondent maria cast and mad sir on the phone into place a welcome, mari
Have clouds build in and the precipitation builds in from the south and west. The first half of the day is dry, colder than yesterday. 30 degrees in the Lehigh Valley. 33 in millville. 35 in cape may. 32 in philadelphia. Its staying above freezing in the city and south and east even into the overnight hours. That will change things a little bit for us as to how were dealing with the precipitation. Snow doesnt arrive until 4 00 p. M. , 6 00 p. M. 3 00 p. M. Well be watching for the arrival. 39 degrees, even if its snowing its in the upper 30s. 7 00 p. M. , its 35 degrees, it will be a wet snow thats melting on most of the surfaces and building up on the grass philadelphia south and east. 4 to 6 00 p. M. This is where the snowfall begins from the southwest to the northeast. From 6 to midnight, thats the crunch time heavy snow in the Lehigh Valley, rain south and east, midnight to 2 00 a. M. It wraps up. Its a quick shut off. This is a quickhitting storm one that will bruise a variety of
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say