said this: the democratic party, they have a majority. they can stop this crime today. some people say, well, they are soft on crime. no, they are not soft on crime. they are pro crime! they want crime! and they want crime because they want to take over what you got! they want to control what you have! they want reparations because they think that people who do the crimes are owed that! bullshit! they are not owed that. you ll note that he stopped short of identifying juiced who these criminals are, just who it is the democrats want preparative justice for. but then for his audience, identification is unnecessary. because whether it s a campaign ad or a trump rally, gop candidates in swing states have weaponized crime as the cudgel against democrats. with that, they ve embraced a time honored tradition on the right. when all else fails, blame black people. even in states they barely live in. across, the irony of insurrection apologies, making statements while criticizin
whistles. in his case, it s more like a scream. what should democrats do in response, congressman? democrats should take note, first of all, that these are not things that periodically happened. they ve always happened right before a major national election. and his comments are about the most vicious, violent, repugnant, racist things i ve heard in a long, long time. and this is how violence gets started against black people as in the case in buffalo, against latinos, as in the case of uvalde, and people who simply worship it as in the charleston church. people take, that basic once, and a figure they have to do something to extend the senators philosophy. i would hope that every elected official on both sides of the aisle condemn that. he is a bigot. until he says something different, he will always be seen as a bigot. more importantly, there are a lot of black people and that s