What i would add to that is sometimes its a oneway change. Sometimes they might introduce systems changes. So theres an accumulation of review policy. Its hard to quantify, but thats the kind of thing were looking for. But do you think that the 90 number, do you think thats an accurate reflection . I dont have that information. I have heard in my business with bank eres, its manifested itself in Additional Resources you have to higher. Particularly as it gets more complex. But, also, diverting their attention away from lending and interacting with their Customer Base, the impact on staff, though varies with the size of the institution and the activities theyre involved in. But it is real based on what we heard from bankers. Similar to what was said before, some of the changes that were looking at different thresholds, but, also the collaborative paper that we put up is the collaboration by sharing the Work Together that could help them manage their cause and require the experience that
Where are we going to come up with paying for another Compliance Officer even though we have no exceptions. I want to ask do i have a minute . Chairman . Will you consider doddfranks plop sigss . Given that the grippa process is looking at rules that are unnecessary, most of the rules have never been itch leapted yet or have taken the fact. Soo it is not we feel, appropriate to look at those rules at this time. Is it fru we wont have another study for 19 years . If we deent include dod frank . Its part of our normal practice. We looked at on an on going basis whether rules are appropriate in terms of still relevant. And we will make changes. Thank you very much for being here. Senator . Thank you, mr. Chairman. I think youre getting a theme here that this is not a partisan issue. This is not something that theres a lot of disagreement on this skmit tee about. Were deeply concerned about the status of communitybase in this country. I look at this in kind of duodifferent ways. First youv
U. S. Rate. I just hope that the department can be aggressive and forward leaning in partnering with the delegation and utilities to solve the problem. Its not a gas problem as you know, and i think its going its going to take an all of the above kind of strategy in terms of permitting and its a really urgent problem for the region and i assume you agree with that. Yes, in fact, the very first field hearings we had for the qer were in new england driven by the gas pipeline issue and the representatives of all six governors were part of that meeting. Frankly, the remarks made were such that the governors felt they, you know, were going to have this under control, and would take care of it. In fact, i understand that next year in 2016, that there will be a substantial expansion of capacity taking gas into the boston area through there but further north is a challenge. There, i dont know how this turns out, and happy to work with you, senator king, and the well, this is a problem of our s
Channel which i understand would open up the channel appropriately. I can go back and look again if youd like. Thats my understanding at least. Thank you. Secondly, the mox facility in charleston, South Carolina dr. Savannah river site. Theres a recent line at the Aerospace Corporation gave unfavorable to the project and out of line from reports from army corp of engineer and suggested another 30 years to completion opposed to eight years its taken to get so far depending on who you speak to. I think aerospace has 50 contractors say 65 and any thoughts on that one . I what experiences does the Aerospace Corporation have on the projects . Thats the first question, and, two, can we have transparency to assumptions because its a complicated project. Assumptions mean everything. Were happy, by the way on the last part, to have completely transparent briefings, what wed like to do on that, and the Aerospace Corporation has been a contractor quite frequently to the nsa part of d. U. E. In te
132 million. These are impressive numbers and keeps us aware of the system here today. To address the first question if you look what the faa tried to do, to shut them down because they didnt have funding, majority of those more contract hours but more faa towers, majority of them were in Rural America. That is one of our biggest concerns about status quo. Thanks for looking out for Rural America. Thank the senator from montana for looking out for Rural America and i think he and i would probably both agree at the end of this we would like to see more direct flights to and from, is that right . I appreciate i think weve run out of questioners and i do appreciate very much the panel great remarks today different perspectives this is the senates first foray into the issue of reform and we have to figure out a way as we move towards reauthorization of doing whats best. We all have the same goal in mind as was pointed out. Sometimes maybe slightly different perspectives on how best to get