House in the t first place. For example, that one related great, things like executive privilege and weather testimony of other witnesses should be included in the Senate Impeachment trial. In other words, house was to tell the senate how to conduct trial. Would the house has job to do, and friendly, i think mishandled it. But now they have no say in the way the senate conducts impeachment trial. Would and if, Speaker Pelosi decides to send them over here. Twelve weeks was all it took for House Democrats to come up with what they believed was enough evidence to warrant a vote on articles of impeachment. And i think theyre experiencing some buyers remorse. During that 12 weeks, we repeatedly heard House Democrats how urgent the matter was. Seemingly using urgent for an excuse for a slapdash investigation that they did. They now regret it. So the house concluded that the rest investigation and passed to articles of impeachment, will expected those articles that we set to the senate promp
Host goods nearly a year and a half since washer russias war against ukraine. We have sent military aid and the American People and u. S. Political leaders support show signs of slipping. It has recently had bipartisan support but tracks among the parties there are a few cracks showing in this support. Welcome to the program, the first part of the program will ask you how you view u. S. Support of ukraine. With the money we have given too far, if you think it is too much, is the number 202 7488000 and if you think it is not enough use 202 7488001 or if you think it is the right amount you can text us at or you can call us at 202 7488002. Text us at 202 7488003. And you can also share your thoughts and comments on twitter and facebook. We look at the amount of spinning powering ukraines defense. The United States has committed aid to ukraine since the beginning of russias fullscale invasion. That includes more than 43 billion dollars in military aid. More than the u. S. Has distributed
Discussion. Hello, welcome, jennifer join us here today. Im a master of arts student here. The north American Free tradee agreement was enforced on january 1, 1994. The agreement was signed by president george bush on december 7 t. And a 1992 when approved by congress in November November 101994. Excuse me, 1993. Nafta is significant because of the most comprehensive Free Trade Agreement negotiated at the time and several groundbreaking provisions served as a template model for the new generation of freetrade agreement the United States later negotiated and also served as a template for certain provisions of multilateral trade negotiations as part of the round. This Year Congress will decide on what legislation to consider into a man on the current nafta. They will also consider the ramifications of negotiating or regarding nafta and how it might affect the u. S. Economy and Foreign Relations of partners mexico and canada. Some contend withdraw from the tpp issue of competitiveness fro
Former white house staffers discuss the impact of second terms on president ial leadership and effectiveness. The Panel Suggests that president s often change their focus to Foreign Policy welding news media is already looking ahead to the next president. This is about an hour and 20 minutes. Think you to the foundation. We have had a great partnership. This is a series where we look at leadership not in the abstract, but at a particular institution. We have the majority leader from the senate, senators lott and daschle. We have also looked at congressional leadership and Foreign Policy. We have a panel of people who are extremely knowledgeable who have served with and encountered multiple president s we can talk about today. Let me say a few things quickly and then introduce our panel. We put together a book about the second term of the bush administration. It was called second term blues. That is not to pick on george bush so much as to say second term president s have difficulties.
To limit the use of predispute forced arbitration clauses in contracts for Financial Services and products. I strongly oppose the Congressional Review Act resolution to dismantle this vital Consumer Protection. Forced arbitration clauses force individuals to sign away their right to go to court as a condition of buying a product or service, and they allow Corporate America to take advantage of a shadow Justice System that is inherently biased toward the corporation, offers no meaningful appeals process. To put it bluntly, these clauses serve one purpose and one purpose alone. To help make sure the giant corporations still come out on top if they have wronged consumers. Thankfully weve started to make some progress in addressing forced arbitration. Five years ago the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau began an intensive study of forced arbitration clauses in consumer Financial Services contracts for things like credit cards, savings accounts and private student loans. The study confir