The here link is nearly three hours. [background noises] [background noises] the hearing of the Senate Appropriations committee will please come to order. We are here today to discuss the u. S. china relationship the investments we need to keep our nation secure, competitive and maintain our leadership on the stage. Let me make clear from the outset we talked about competing against china encountering chinese influence we are talking about competing against its governments. Not the Chinese People are the millions of Chinese Americans to help make our country great. Im glad to have a secretary austin, blinken and were mondo here to discuss the all of government approach we need to meet this challenge. And this is our First Full Committee Hearing i do want to thank vice chair collins as well as her chairs and Ranking Member chester, kuhn and moran for working with us on this topic that i know every one of our members cares about. Like to thank all of my colleagues for their work in the r
Because i think youve provided objective fact based views on what the dangers are and the risks, and potentially even human extinction, an existential threat which i mentioned by many more than just the three of you, experts who know firsthand the potential for harm. But these fears need to be addressed. I think they can be addressed through many of the concessions that you are making to us and others as well. Ive come to the conclusion that we need some kind of regulatory, not just a reactive body. Not just a passive rules to the road maker, edicts on what guardrails should be. But actually investing proactively in research so that we develop countermeasures against the kinds of autonomous apple controlled scenarios that are a potential danger. Artificial intelligence device is in effect programed to resist any turning off. A decision by a. I. To begin Nuclear Reaction to a nonexistent attack. The white house certainly has recognized the urgency with a historic meeting of the seven Ma
Because i think youve provided objective fact based views on what the dangers are and the risks, and potentially even human extinction, an existential threat which i mentioned by many more than just the three of you, experts who know firsthand the potential for harm. But these fears need to be addressed. I think they can be addressed through many of the concessions that you are making to us and others as well. Ive come to the conclusion that we need some kind of regulatory, not just a reactive body. Not just a passive rules to the road maker, edicts on what guardrails should be. But actually investing proactively in research so that we develop countermeasures against the kinds of autonomous apple controlled scenarios that are a potential danger. Artificial intelligence device is in effect programed to resist any turning off. A decision by a. I. To begin Nuclear Reaction to a nonexistent attack. The white house certainly has recognized the urgency with a historic meeting of the seven Ma
The here link is nearly three hours. [background noises] [background noises] the hearing of the Senate Appropriations committee will please come to order. We are here today to discuss the u. S. china relationship the investments we need to keep our nation secure, competitive and maintain our leadership on the stage. Let me make clear from the outset we talked about competing against china encountering chinese influence we are talking about competing against its governments. Not the Chinese People are the millions of Chinese Americans to help make our country great. Im glad to have a secretary austin, blinken and were mondo here to discuss the all of government approach we need to meet this challenge. And this is our First Full Committee Hearing i do want to thank vice chair collins as well as her chairs and Ranking Member chester, kuhn and moran for working with us on this topic that i know every one of our members cares about. Like to thank all of my colleagues for their work in the r
Because i think youve provided objective fact based views on what the dangers are and the risks, and potentially even human extinction, an existential threat which i mentioned by many more than just the three of you, experts who know firsthand the potential for harm. But these fears need to be addressed. I think they can be addressed through many of the concessions that you are making to us and others as well. Ive come to the conclusion that we need some kind of regulatory, not just a reactive body. Not just a passive rules to the road maker, edicts on what guardrails should be. But actually investing proactively in research so that we develop countermeasures against the kinds of autonomous apple controlled scenarios that are a potential danger. Artificial intelligence device is in effect programed to resist any turning off. A decision by a. I. To begin Nuclear Reaction to a nonexistent attack. The white house certainly has recognized the urgency with a historic meeting of the seven Ma