facilities, separating families, deporting people including americans. and it s not only changed the fabric of america but changed how the world is looking at the united states of america. on the front page of the paper there were quotes from this gunman saying i was trying to shoot as many mexicans as i could, and we didn t hear anything from the president of the united states for 48 hours. people here have noticed that and they re talking about it, ali. the right to down-play this specifically ideological complex of the el paso massacre is an apparently self-serving effort to absolve this president of moral responsibility for his damaging rhetoric. this too shouldn t wash. the president is guilty in a broad sense of a form of incitement. to stephanie s point this is as clear an opportunity as one gets for republicans to be able to say this isn t america, this is a bridge too far.
apply for asimem when they ve reached america and on american soil. and what s happening now is they re going in detention facilities, separating families, deporting people including americans. and it s not only changed the fabric of america but changed how the world is lookinga at th united states of america. on the front page of the paper there were quotes from this gunman saying i was trying to shoot as many mexicans as i could, and we didn t hear anything from the president of the united states for 48 hours. people here have noticed that and they re talking about it, ali. the right to down-play this specifically ideological complex of the el paso massacre is an apparently self-serving effort to absolve this president of moral responsibility for his damaging rhetoric. this too shouldn t wash. the president is guilty in a broad sense of a form of incitement. to stephanie s point this is as clear an opportunity as one gets
self-serving effort by a nameless and faceless official? i m an episcopalian so i choose both. i think both are of course michael is an old seminary boy from across the tibur. i think they could be i think both could be true. i understand the argument that if you believe this, you have an obligation to tell congress and begin official moves, perhaps on the 25th amendment. that s a rather high-minded argument, and it s easier to say that from the outside. i think one way is would you have rather had a full cyrus vance, the secretary of state under jimmy carter who resigned on principle, on protest, over the desert 1 operation, and have
it. abby: acknowledging that there s a problem. here is what they put out. they said they will work with news outlets like fox news channel, more local news, visiting news room and actually talking to journalists. question, is this going to solve the fake news problem? here is what it will do. this is a very self-serving effort on facebook s part, why? well, a lot of people don t understand at home that for months and months facebook has been knocking on the doors of media companies trying to promote their video, facebook made effort toward video. this is going to seal the deal in effort to try to get big media organizations to put their video and content on the facebook platform. what s that going to do? look down the road for facebook to one day be the arbitror of
and mouse game, that s going to be sensational. it was. the execution was as ghastly as you could possibly imagine. our research uncovered a lot of things about how it was done and why it was done and who did it really. and we lay it all out like we did with kennedy and lincoln. you promote killing jesus on 9:0 60 minutes and the vie. i thought people didn t like. did you they get rate. you say it is a self-serving effort by the organizations? i think they feel there is a guy in a country selling millions of books. killing jesus will sell 5 million books. that s unheard of. the highest rated cable news show for 13 years. there has to be something there. thus if we get him on our show maybe we will get some of this. you like to it up a narrative you versus the media. i think you have become more