to campaign for president. of the united states all in the last 5 months. they want all their trials in the next 6 to 12 months. that s not coincidence. he is charged with crimes relating to election activity. he is charged with crimes relates to documents. he is charged with crimes related to nondisclosure agreements, he is changed with crimes relating to campaign activity in one state. he was changed before, with a phony impeachment, he turned out to be right. and they didn t go through the normal due process such as it is that house of representatives has traditionally, then he was changed again with door impeachment. another impeachment and dried in mar-a-lago an. he never did. then we had mueller criminal
to campaign for president. of the united states all in the last 5 months. they want all their trials in the next 6 to 12 months. that s not coincidence. he is charged with crimes relating to election activity. he is charged with crimes relates to documents. he is charged with crimes related to nondisclosure agreements, he is changed with crimes relating to campaign activity in one state. he was changed before, with a phony impeachment, he turned out to be right. and they didn t go through the normal due process such as it is that house of representatives has traditionally, then he was changed again with door impeachment. another impeachment and dried in mar-a-lago an. he never did. then we had mueller criminal
to campaign for president. of the united states all in the last 5 months. they want all their trials in the next 6 to 12 months. that s not coincidence. he is charged with crimes relating to election activity. he is charged with crimes relates to documents. he is charged with crimes related to nondisclosure agreements, he is changed with crimes relating to campaign activity in one state. he was changed before, with a phony impeachment, he turned out to be right. and they didn t go through the normal due process such as it is that house of representatives has traditionally, then he was changed again with door impeachment. another impeachment and dried in mar-a-lago an. he never did. then we had mueller criminal
joyce, mark meadows says that his case should be moved to federal court because he was working as a federal official for trump in georgia. or on behalf of trump in the white house in georgia. but fani willis argues that his conduct was political in nature, and she points out that the prohibits federal officials from engaging in election activity. today mark meadows s attorney fired back claiming luis s hatch act for arguments a red herring. what do you think? so this is a very nuanced legal argument. it s important to understand that the law here is very defendant friendly. this removal statute is often used to protect federal law enforcement officers who are charged with crimes in the state of court based on their conduct. to say when executing a search warrant, or making an arrest. so the law intends to protect federal officers. it s not a very good fit here though. federal judge, steve johns,
both be tried together if possible. joyce, mark meadows says that his case should be moved to federal court because he was working as a federal official for trump in georgia. or on behalf of trump in the white house in georgia. but fani willis argues that his conduct was political in nature, and she points out that the hatch act prohibits federal officials from engaging in election activity. today mark meadows s attorney fired back claiming willis s hatch act for arguments are a red herring. what do you think? so this is a very nuanced legal argument. it s important to understand that the law here is very defendant friendly. this removal statute is often used to protect federal law enforcement officers who are charged with crimes in the state court based on their conduct, say when executing a search warrant, or making an arrest. so the law intends to protect federal officers. it s not a very good fit here