Attacking Power Plants and a seaport after houthi militants fired missiles at israel over the past two days, marking the a fresh exchange in yet another front of this regional conflict. Welcome to Fox News live, im mike emanuel. Hezbollah has confirmed that another of its senior leaders was killed in an overnight Israeli Airstrike as the body of leader nasrallah has been recovered following Fridays Strike as iran says his death will be avenged. Fox news senior correspondent Mike Tobin is live in haifa, israel, with the latest. Hello, mike. Reporter hello, mike. Iran is now condemning this latest strike as Israel Disregards condemnation from enemies and does the not let up on the pressure. This latest strike went into houthicontrolled yemen hitting a port and a power plant. This after two days of ballistic missiles fired by the houthis at central israel. Those missiles were intercepted, no injuries. Israel fired on that port back in july after the I Houthis hit Tel Aviv with a Drone Kil
new mexico to campaign for democrat gubernatorial candidate michelle. nothing on his schedule and he plans to stop by the southern border while he is there. todd: in the meantime, we did not mention the border crisis one single time nor did he talk about crime, conflation, gas prices were many of the other issues boaters they actually matter to them. brooke singman wrapping all of it up for you this morning, good morning. hey, good morning, guys president biden will go the final days of the midterm elections as he heads to new mexico and california this camping trip comes after he blasted maga republicans in a dramatic speech last night, listen. week, the people, must decide whether the rule of law prevails or whether we will allow the dark forces to thirst for power. put a head of the principles that have long guided us. you know america democracy is under attack because the defeated former president of the united states refused to accept the results of the 2020 ele el
lends credibility to a policy that you might not agree with. all i can say is, yes, that is a risk, but there were occasions where we overtly, at the podium, disagreed on the evidence that was underlying, or at least explain to the evidence that underlay a decision. so, for example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lower figure, example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lowerfigure, i was clear on the podium that two metres is safer than one metre, full stop. it does not mean it is unreasonable to make a policy decision to move, but the evidence base was clear. so thatis but the evidence base was clear. so that is a rather long answer to your question, because i do not know whether, ultimately, it is the right or wrong thing for us to have been there. i think it is something worth looking at. my gut feeling is it was probably overall beneficial for us to be there. probably overall beneficial for us to be there- probably overall beneficial for us to be there. , .
this primary, donald trump allows republican primary voters to have their cake and eat it too. they think they can beat joe by biden and they think they agree with him on the issues. it s not the divisive segmenting out of republican primary voters that it may have been in a democratic primary electorate in 2020, where those who were less concerned about electability may not have been initially supportive of joe biden. in this case they really don t have to make that choice. they think donald trump has it all for them. yeah, and this, robert, is what s so important about the big lie, the alternative reality. i didn t lose to him. i didn t lose by 7 million votes. i didn t get my butt kicked as a first term incumbent like george h. w. bush did by a guy who, quote, never left his basement because people hate to be so much. that s the reality, though. and if you don t let people hold on to that, why not nominate me again?
strategist, and communications director of the 2008 obama campaign, and a senior adviser for the 2012 obama campaign. molly, i want to start with a question of electability. particularly in 2020, when you pull democratic voters it was a huge thing of who can beat trump? that s what we want. even when you gave them that choice, the closer my policies can beat trump, it was beat trump. the iowa polling in the national polling polling is the inverse of that. republican primary voters say they don t care. what do you make of that? how does that change the way the dynamics of this race work? i think in this case, in this primary, donald trump allows republican primary voters to have their cake and eat it too. they think they can beat joe by biden and they think they agree with him on the issues. it s not the divisive segmenting out of republican primary voters that it may have been in a democratic primary electorate in 2020, where those who were less concerned about electability may not