behind the scenes at fox, while they peddled election lies on air. tonight, we re combing through hundreds of pages of brand-new filings, then. i think what happened on january 6th was despicable. this attack on the capitol i didn t listen to tucker carlson. i usually don t. condemnation from all sides as fox tries to launder the insurrection. tucker carlson is a propagandist, publicly pretending to be a news man. with the explicit help of republican house leadership. speaker mccarthy knows damn well what kind of customer mr. carlson is. as abortion bans threaten countless women in texas, one of the five women now suing the state will join me tonight. sounds like the pretty twisted plot to a dystopian novel, but it s not. it s exactly what happened to me while pregnant in texas. when all in starts now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes, and in the wake of tucker carlson s attempt to discuss deceived his viewers about what happened on je
house press secretary for president biden. her new show, inside jen s psaki, will preview on the 19th. she joins me now. i imagine that this is the kind of thing you could imagine rupert murdoch does, but seeing in black and white that he is literally, we don t know for sure, sharing confidential ads with the other campaign. it really does kind of put a fine point on it. it does. it s like a scene out of succession or something, chris, but it s the intertwined aspect that we all suspected and that we have all seen hints of but that s an actual example. these ads are telling the campaign strategy, there s a lot of the biden campaign ran a lot of them, and so it s not clear how much content was shared, how frequently. but still, that s information that obviously shouldn t be shared by a news organization, to state the complete obvious. i want to share this. i think this is a really interesting aspect here that gets it something. you were working on campaigns, here now in a position s
stabbing did not testify. its enamel-safe formula lifts and removes stains qstion here leo and i think the to provide 100% noticeably whiter teeth or your money back. difficulty of this from a moral perspective is the president says he s looking out for our try crest 3d whitestrips. war fighters but of course there were members of his own unit that were so distressed by the actions that they took tremendous risk to come forward to testify, to talk to investigators and they have essentially been thrown by the wayside. that s the question here. he has thrown himself in gallagher s corner and said he s standing up for war fighters by standing with him but as we saw from the release today a lot of the public heard some of the s.e.a.l.s didn t like him. i don t know what the effect will be of seeing in black and white here just how emotional some of their testimony is and how many folks are sort of left in the wake of this. now, you know, if you re a member of the military and you re seei
that russia interfered in the election that russia interfered in the election with the intention of helping donald trump that they had a basis for saying that. and we could have also assumed that their basis for saying that was something that they appropriately shared with the president elect. but seeing in black and white in this new york times story the nature of that information, the detailed nature of that information, adding to it the kind of granular information that we got in the indictment there, it really does cause you to engage in a kind of thought experiment. what would a normal, responsible, emotionally stable, intellectually honest president-elect and now president do if he discovered that this kind of interference had been done to aid his election? he would express horror and outrage. he would insist on getting to the bottom of this. donald trump, for whatever
that russia interfered in the election that russia interfered in the election with the intention of helping donald trump that they had a basis for saying that. and we could have also assumed that their basis for saying that was something that they appropriately shared with the president elect. but seeing in black and white in this new york times story the nature of that information, the detailed nature of that information, adding to it the kind of granular information that we got in the indictment there, it really does cause you to engage in a kind of thought experiment. what would a normal, responsible, emotionally stable, intellectually honest president-elect and now president do if he discovered that this kind of interference had been done to aid his election? he would express horror and outrage. he would insist on getting to