illegal. that s clearly what we have in this case. that s what we have, the guns were legal. so what we never want to do is go to where the power and profit sits. so what we do, we talk about we need this for children. and we need to deal we need to criminalize the mental health which is what we will do, but what we don t do is treat the issue. also, we have a security mind-set, understandably, right? exactly. the impulse of apocalypse for security is primal and some ways the way all other politics should be dealt. you know, if you don t have security, then a lot of the things that about the way we self-govern become very difficult to pull off. yet at the same time, i don t think we necessarily think in say rigorous fashion about security. a lot of security poses, this is eric madfast who assistant professor in tacoma.
qaeda in afghanistan. it s not just afghanistan, there s kinetic synergy at pakistan and afghanistan. you re another person who comes here saying we need to be in afghanistan because of pakistan. we need toรง be afghanistan because of the security poses in afghanistan. we need troops in afghanistan because we re concerned about pakistan? the most successful, knowledgeable leaders on these issues unquestionably. say not quite yet, a little longer so we can get to the intermediate goal, make it general patreaus. absolutely. what lessons do you take away from ten years in the war in america. what happened again happened to us on 9/11 came from a place like say yemen. would you again do what we did