if republicans still spending hundreds of billions on healthcare is mean, tell me what constitutes nice? it s still covering people with pre-existing conditions is heartless, what shows heart? if keeping kids on your policy longer matters when democrats do it, how about republicans? if democrats bemoaning the republicans about paying for it, makes then clueless? if barack obama calls it a massive transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich, wasn t he the one that started this transfer in reverse exploding costs on the poor and the rich? no, this is not about a massive transfer of wealth. it s about a massive departure from reality. i m the geek here. i ve done the math. what is mean, my friends, is doubling premiums you promised would stay low. what is mean is limiting options for care when you promised they would have plenty of options for care. what is mean is saying you can
republicans are to blame for the mess that is the healthcare now as if they created this. as things stand now, the problems are with the law itself exists. when americans are asked, we don t like the republican plan, first of all, they ve not been given on honest assessment. we just got this one. the point in the dissatisfaction and the frustration with healthcare coverage is what is out there and available right now. a lot of americans are very anxious about it. right now. also, the democrats are demagoguing the issue of putting some sort of frame work of controls and responsibility on medicaid. medicaid was intended as a safety net. now 74 million americans are enrolled in medicaid. 20 million more than in medicare, the program for the elderly. in fact, here s an astounding fact.
keep your doctor when you can t keep your doctor. what is mean is forcing young people to pay up for coverage when maybe they can t afford that coverage. what is mean is saying government subsidies will help when they won t or plenty of state exchanges will have their back when they can t. what is mean, premium increases. keeps soaring. coverage that keeps shrinking. what is mean the telling folks healthcare is like money in the bank even if it means there s no money left in their pocket. that s what s mean. that is what is heartless. not republicans introducing democrats to something called math, but democrats that concocted this mess ignoring that math. it s deplorable to do things in secret. remember the closed doors? they re not pretty. but chuck schumer lecturing anybody on keeping them open? that is pretty stupid. what is heartless is when the
times. they re out there because the law they hope to replace is not remotely close to even passable. you could argue, republicans aren t doing any favors by replaying one healthcare program with a slightly less big old healthcare programs. that does not mean that republicans are moral sinners. i just find it odd that the same folks that feared republicans would repeal healthcare have in fact gone to great lengths, those republicans to security healthcare. oddly keeping the one thing that they said they would rip apart. god knows it s not helping the grand old party, but don t you find it somehow that they re getting the blame for the disaster of obamacare? that s not party. there are facts. not president obama himself who is getting the blame who seems to have forgotten the empty promises behind obamacare. he made the promises. now they re lecturing