time. tell me what you read in the copy you were given. copy you were given. it s 84 pages, it s a but the copy you were given. it s 84 pages, it s a but the highlight copy you were given. it s 84 pages, it s a but the highlight could - copy you were given. it s 84 pages, it s a but the highlight could be - it s a but the highlight could be twitter is a dysfunctional security disaster or has been for a long time. maybe that won t surprise people who are familiar with this but even people who cover this area such as myself and colleagues who we did this work together, even i had myjaw on the floor. i heard from people to work at twitter today was that theirjob was on the floor. much, that s his nickname, he alleges the company security systems were extremely exposed, example way too many people doing back had access to the key software of the company. he alleged they were holding on to use a dater that they claimed they had a raise. he alleged that they were lying to federal agenci
the scope and scale of twitter and the public discourse. i m smiling. we went back and forth so much on that line. it s a writing process. but multiple cooks. but what mudge is alleging even for someone like me that has covered social media like my job is on the floor and i heard from people who worked at twitter who didn t know about this who said their jaws were on the floor as well. this was an incredibly explosive complaint with its 84 pages, so lots of parts, but some of the main allegations are that the company was a security disaster. that has been known for a while but not the extent. twitter had a massive hack in 2009 that led night a consent decree with the federal trade commission. in 2020 there was a massive hack that actually these floridaed teenagers infiltrated the accounts of twitter employees and took over the accounts of
is very much like him when it comes to the upcoming elections. speaking of the word danger, there s an another excerpt from the book that details twice in the final months, general milley was so afraid that donald trump would spark a war with china that he made secret calls to his chinese counterpart to ease tension. from a homeland security perspective, olivia, what do you make of that? how extraordinary were the concerns if this was the length that general milley was willing to go? i think general milley did the right thing. i think what he was trying to do through diplomatic channels was to sort of assuage any concerns and prevent an escalation or a natural disaster, natural security disaster from happening by the chinese misunderstanding whatever trump s rhetoric was at the time and preventing this conflict from escalating. because the president would say
security disaster in our history. i think it will be a top priority. and senator lindsey graham, the man who refused twice to vote to convict donald trump, is now threatening to impeach joe biden over afghanistan. if we leave any americans behind, leave thousands of those afghans who fought along our side behind bravely, joe biden deserves to be impeached for a higher crime and misdemeanor of dare election of duty. if we leave one american behind, if we don t get the afghans who stepped up to the plate to help us out, then joe biden, in my view, has kmiet committed a high crime and misdemeanor under the constitution and should be impeached. david, a white house senior advisor for president obama. thanks for coming on the show. you experienced republican bad faith attacks benghazi.
context, the word lonesome doesn t need to be put in context. when you say somebody will be an action with security disaster, that doesn t need to be put in context. these texts have been out there for what come almost two years now. so your viewers are smart enough to read and know the lead fbi agent and the lead fbi were biased against donald trump. that is who is investigating him in 2016. i m not sure how she thinks context will improve that. martha: you had an exchange with peter strzok who try to give you some of the contacts of the text messages. and you kind of shutting down. here is that. it is important to take those texts in the context how they were written and what they meant. trey: someone may ask you that question peter strzok but i didn t. what i can tell you is that text in no way suggested that i or the fbi would take any action to influence the candidacy. trey: that is a fantastic answer to a question nobody asked. martha: they both say that when you look a