Argument on legal access to online information and whether police and other enforcement officers can access information for personal purposes. Hear argument next in van buren versus united states. Mr. Fisher. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, the cfaa is an antihacking statute. To ensure comprehensive coverage, the statute prohibits exceeding authorized access. This ensures that the statute covers not just outside, but also inside hackers. In this case, however, the government seeks to transform the prong of the cfaa into a different prohibition. This prong covers obtaining any information via computer that the assessor is not entitled under the circumstances to obtain. It is no overstatement to say that this construction would brand most americans criminal on a daily basis. The scenarios are limitless, but a few examples will suffice. Imagine a secretary who says that her email or zoom account may be used only for businesses purposes or a person using a dating website whe
Mr. Chief justice, made please the court, it is an antihacking statute. Seatingprohibits the that succeeding access. It also covers not only outside but inside hackers. The government seeks to transform the prong into a different prohibition. It covers obtaining information by a computer that predecessor is not entitled under the circumstances to obtain. It is no overstatement to say this would brand most americans criminals on a daily basis. Scenarios are limitless. Imagine a secretary whose employee handbook says her emailers them account may be used only for business purposes, or a person using a dating site using false information to obtain information about a lossal mates, or student. If a government is right, any of these people commits a federal crime. Any employee that use the zoom account over the next giving to connect with relatives would be subject to federal prosecutors. The main argument is that a single two letter word in the definition under exceeds authorized access. T
Our broadcasting live from our studios in moscow recounting the weeks top stories with our weekly program. But at least 4 iraqi soldiers have been injured in iraq a strike on the air base to the north of baghdad the facility also houses american personnel and was previously targeted after the u. S. Assassination of irans top general earlier my colleague you know neil discussed the story with don quarter. We still have a lot of different reports in terms of figures of how many missiles or mortars hit the base some are saying that 7 mortar bombs hit the bases runway another says 4 rockets hit the base but we have heard from Iraqi Security officials and they say that 8 katyusha rockets launched were launched at the base and made contact across the board though we do know that at least 4 Iraqi Military personnel have been injured and are hospitalized now we also know with the base its been in the news before because it had a sizeable american presence thats where american troops where in t
Coming to rescue a group of White Helmets and hairs on the russian planes are targeting civilians. For the latest on these stories you can head to our website on t. V. Dot com and stay with us now though for the Financial News in the kaiser poll. You. Guys are this is the kaiser report news out of japan. Yes of course our President Donald Trump was over there recently but i want to look at this headline about what the bank of japan is doing and this is a tweet from daniel a colony says the bank of japan now owns 73 percent of all of the countrys e. T. F. Market if you think buying bonds stocks and e. T. F. Supports growth and jobs you may also believe that dancing in circles attracts rain so you know this the black section there is the bank of japan and the red section is the rest of the Market Participants. Crazy you know thing about capitalism is just false to create companies they compete they make products some of them fail some of them succeed theres a central bank there in case t
Withdrawing the proposal with michael barr or the other governors . I do not want to get into our internal doings, but i understand it is a live option. We are not at this stage to have that discussion yet because we do not has we have to decide what changes we think are appropriate. Then the question will be when we get to that point, if a proposal is the right thing to do, we will not hesitate at all. In the current environment that we have and politics, there is not a lot that you find bipartisan agreement on, but you could find some agreement in withdrawing that proposal. Can you explain the importance of consensus . Are you concerned with recent trends of disagreement among Board Members . I say think we will get to broad consensus in the fed. This has been our culture. We try to find common ground, and we have been able to do that in the regulatory space. I expect we will hear as well. Could we be seeing this level of disagreement because of extreme measures being taken now that