comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Section 279 ipc - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Animals may be mute but we have to speak on their behalf: Punjab and Haryana High Court rejects compromise

The Court refused to accept a compromise to quash a case of rash driving in which one buffalo died and another got injured.

Harsh bungerIndian penal codePunjab and haryana high courtPunjab haryana hcLegal newsCourt newsSection 279 ipcSection 429 ipcCompromise in rash driving caseAnimal rightsStray cattleStray animalsBuffalo death in road accidentRight to life animalsJustice harsh bungerLegal updates

Kerala High Court Asks 65-Year-Old Convicted For Causing Death By Negligent Driving To Do Community Service, Applies Probation Of Offenders Act

The Kerala High Court released a 65-year old man who was convicted for rash and negligent driving which led to the death of a person as per Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act (Act) on grounds.

State of keralaSaji charivukala puthenveeduJathadevan namboodiriDattatray gulabrao phalkeSanjaysinh ramrao chavanJusticeg girishV philip mathewKishan raoSessions courtApex courtMagistrate courtOffenders actDistrict hospitalDistrict probation officerChief judicial magistrateGulabrao phalke

Driving at high speed alone will not attract offence of rash and negligent driving: Bombay High Court

Single-judge Justice SM Modak said that the offence of rash and negligent driving needs to satisfy two components - rashness and negligence.

Bombay high courtHigh courtSingle judge justiceIndian penal codeMotor vehiclesBombay highBombay high court newsBombay high court ordersJustice sm modakRash drivingNegligent drivingSpeedy drivingMotor vehicle accidentRash driving bombay high courtRash and negligent drivingRash and negligent driving bombay high court

Dogs, cats are not human beings: Bombay High Court quashes FIR against Swiggy delivery person who accidentally mowed down dog

The bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Prithviraj Chavan said that offences of rash driving, endangering lives etc under the IPC would not apply in cases where the victim is an animal.

Justice prithviraj chavanJustices revati mohite dereBombay high courtBombay high court newsBombay high court updatesBombay high court pets are not humansBombay high court animals are not humansBombay high court quashing of firBombay high court swiggy delivery boySwiggy delivery boyPrevention of cruelty to animals actJustice revati mohite dereSection 279 ipcSection 337 ipc

Rash Driving under IPC, Motor Vehicles Act offences would not be attracted for accidents involving pet animal: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that offences of rash driving or mischief of killing animals under IPC and offences under Motor Vehicles Act will not be attracted in the event of an accident involving a pet animal.

Karnataka high courtRash drivingRash driving ipcSection 279 ipcSection 428 ipcMotor vehicles actPet animal accident motor vehicles actPet animal accident offencePet animal accident offence rash drivingPet animal accident karnataka high courtJustice suraj govindrajSection 429 ipcSection 134 motor vehicles actSection 187 motor vehicles actMotor vehicles act karnataka high courtRash driving karnataka high court

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.