u.s. law in leaking the documents. and wikileaks is not finished. they have to release another 15,000 secret afghan war documents. and now, over to the pentagon. what senior the most explosive revelations? reporter: perhaps the most explosive is that the secretary of state ordered u.s. diplomats to spy on other foreign diplomats ordering them to find out their credit card and frequent flyer numbers and a pentagon program, at least, has been compromised, a secret drone program in yemen. from the cables, i am reading yemen president told general petraeus we will continue saying the bombs are ours, not yours, and another cable reveals that russian prime minister future in and italian prime minister exchanged lavish gifts and energy contracts, calling him the mouth piece of future in in
willing to talk to him about his request for help in reviewing a second round of secret afghan war documents. jenna, over to you. jenna: time to tackle a really big question we ve been looking into. will the developers of the ground zero mosque consider building it somewhere else? new york governor david paterson s office giving a statement to fox news he is working to set up a meeting with them to talk about that possibility. but the develop says nothing is scheduled. congressman peter king spoke with the governor yesterday about this meeting and congressman king joins us now. so nice to have you, congressman. thank you. thank you, jenna. jenna: congressman, what exactly did the governor say to you yesterday about this meeting? the governor called me about 10:30 on my cell phone. ironically enough i was block and a half from the proposed mosque when he called me to say that he had scheduled a meeting. he was going to have a meeting in the next day or so with the developers and l
america, this is choosing time, do you want to take the path of darkness and hatred, or what we have always been, the shining city on the hill? don t tell us the dream wasn t true. i believe today and i want to believe tomorrow. we ll be back with congressman mike rogers who s calling for the execution of the wikileaks whistle blower and if he s found guilty of leaking those secret afghan war documents. plus the debate over sanctuary cities, is it time for the government to crack down on places that shelter illegal immigrants? and a push to legalize marijuana, should pot be regulated and taxed like alcohol? ] [ man ] well, we get along yeah, we really do - and there s nothing wrong - [ bird squawks ]
gregg: can anything be done to stop him from releasing more documents? should he be facing charges for the leak? let s bring in two, joey let me start with you. he says, i love crushing was ascertained, forgive me language but it s his. it s an intent to harm or kill. if true and it could be proven that lives have been lost as a consequence, can it be charged with murder? listen, he needs to be charged whether it s murder or something else. he needs to be charged, there is no question about it. we are talking about significant issues. we are talking about national security. in these publications, remember you are publishing the names of confidential informants and not only that, it seems like he a happy that he did it and threatening he is going to do it again.
and will remain concerned that, that if wikileaks continues on its current path, this doll damage to our national security. but julian assange has said that wikileaks, quote, will not be suppressed. he goes on to say, quote, we will continue to expose abuse by this administration and others. greg: well, i was talking to two lawyers on our legal panel about how the taliban is paying attention now to these leaks, right? well, it s public. it s out there. the taliban spokesman told a britteddish tv station in a telephone interview, quote, we will investigate through our own secret service whether the people mentioned in the reports, he s talking about, in the documents, are really spies working for the u.s. if they arez spies, then we know how to punish them. but assange argues that there is, quote, no clear evidence that the leaks have put any innocent people or informants in danger. the u.s. military and the u.s. government strongly disagree.