And the president needs something to energize his base. Nothing would energize republicans more than lets save the president. Good to see you and welcome back. A morgan, let me just try and start with you. Because giuliani is now saying maybe this whole investigation will help republicans come november. Well, yeah, i think the president has actually said that himself at amou lot of these rallies, of theyre going to try to impeach me, to motivate his base. Theyre looking for things to galvanize their base, and the president tends to turn things on their heads. He wants to energize the base, will it work . I think one thing Law Enforcement tends to be bad at and that eegsz mos politics. The latest news from around the world with host Brooke Baldwin. The president s team doesnting want doesnt want to do that especially this close to the election. But their jobs are to protect him. Rudy giuliani is not a trial attorney, so hes not representing the president in a court of law, he is there a
ainsley: how will they get through that. don t know the exact number to be released. why i say the president is being proven correct because he has said this is a do-over. and that s exactly what the democrats want to do. they want to be able to take the underlying documents and second guess mueller and draw a different conclusion from the same documents. almost ungeraldo of for the justice department to release raw evidence to another entity so that the justice department can be second-guessed but that s what the attorney general agreed to do yesterday. steve: ultimately jerry nadler and the democrats, if they were to impeach, it s not a criminal thing, it s a political thing. correct. correct. but, you know, the president is out of legal jeopardy. because the mueller group, the mueller investigation is over with. but he is not out of political jeopardy because of his opponents in the howrption. they will take documents acquired in the legal investigation and use them as the presi
i believe they have the godfather here today. mr. dean. the first announced witness of the 116th congress is michael cohen a guy that sits in prison today for lying to congress. today, chairman nadler brings in front of the judiciary committee a guy to talk about obstruction of justifiable who went to prisoner in 1974 for obstructing justifiable. in the last two years did you know you sent 970 tweets about donald trump? all 970 tweets about donald trump are anti-donald trump. you are functionally here as a prop because they can t impeach president trump and you sit before us here with no knowledge of a single fact on the mueller report on a hearing entitled lessons from the mueller report. brian: this is what he thinks of president trump he has horrible things to say about ronald reagan. he said steve. he wrote a book about that. has no idea how much money he made.
judiciary committee. this is a terrible embarrassment. and the core premise, the heart of their argument is based on a fallacy. it s based on fiction. and it s going nowhere and they proved that yesterday. ainsley: if they wanted to get someone in there to disgrace the president or talk about the mueller report, that s the best they could do? the whole universe and they have got to go back some 40-plus years t to do this. ainsley: guy who spent time behind bars for obstruction. exactly. they have nobody that they are going to call up. it is interesting they won t call up mueller. i don t think they want to go through the gauntlet of jim jordan and doug collins and matt gaetz and john ratcliffe asking questions about the genesis of all these things. we have been talking about this for months. mueller last nothing on the president and that leaves nadler with an empty bag. brian: right. here is some of the
the new york times says what drew the president s attention to matthew whittaker and over time the attention of democrats when on 2017 whittaker appeared on cnn to talk about mueller s russia probe. he argued that the president made the right call in the firing of former fbi director jim comey saying president trump made the right decision. in an op-ed he argued that investigations into the president s business and finances raise serious concerns that the special council s investigation was a mere witch hunt. on cnn in july of 2017 he suggested a new attorney general could starve mueller s investigation of funds rather than fire him. i can see a scenario jeff sessions is replaced with a recessed point and that attorney general doesn t fire bob mueller but he reduces the budget so low