Minister. And i took him at his word. That thats what he meant. And i think that a lot of voters inside of israel understood him to be saying that fairly unequivocally. Afterwards, he pointed out that he didnt say never but there would be a series of conditions in which a palestinian state could potentially be created, but of course, the conditions were such that they would be impossible to meet any time soon. So even if you accept it, i think the corrective Prime Minister netanyahus in subsequent days, there still does not appear to be a prospect of a meaningful framework established that would lead to a palestinian state even if there were a whole range of conditions and security requirements that might be phased in over a long period of time. Which was always the presumption. I dont think anybody ever envisioned in any peace agreement, certainly not one that Prime Minister netanyahu would agree to, where the israeli people would agree to that overnight you suddenly have a palestinia
Bill aimed at encouraging the development of energyefficient technologies for use in both commercial and residential buildings. Senate majority leader harry reid expressed dismay that efforts had failed to yield an overall agreement on amendments to move the bill forward, but he says hes hopeful members can regroup this week to advance the measure. Today theyll also debate and vote on two judicial nominations to the u. S. Court of federal claims. Over in the house, theres a brief pro forma session at 2 eastern, no legislative business expected. A comprehensive Forest Management bill that would direct the Agricultural Department to establish Timber Harvesting zones, also to resize and renew nutrition assistance programs that were not included in the farm bill. Follow the house live on cspan and the senate on cspan2. Cspan, created by americas Cable Companies in 1979, brought to you as a Public Service by your television provider. Host well, it was in 2010 that the federal Communications
Rights in egypt . Again, i agree that it is not a coincidence. An opportunity in january of 2011 to have a discontinuation, to have a cut off point to say this was the have transparent and Accountable Government and lets at least the senior level of administration to see who needs to be transferred to maria trained and prosecuted or at least relieved from duty. Byre was at least an attempt the very first cabinet that came, that was appointed after mubaraks ouster, there was an attempt to have laws that would not have criminalized, not have ushered in prosecutions for past corruption, what did that socked , torevent future corruption really address the root causes of corruption like conflict of interest laws, more transparent and publicly accessible budget making postings and final outcome. The military council that was in power that came after mubarak had a vested interest in. Aintaining the mubarak state that is why we did not see a coherent prosecution strategy for past corruption an
Was not given the license to practice law in ohio. So there has to be some type of parody, some type of fairness, if there are sanctions at all. So you would be against blanket bans on all who have been convicted being ineligible to receive a license to practice law . I dont think blanket bans do any justice. All right. Mr. Jones . I think unless there is some Public Safety that outweighs a persons right to get a law law sense, to pass the bar, unless there is some Public Benefit that outweighs that person practicing law, then i would say, he should not have that restriction or any automatic mandatory bans. Do you know of any initiatives by the aba or state Bar Association to address that particular issue . Either one of you . No. I know the project of the collateral consequence of the project did not entail that. It had to do with cataloging and assembling the collateral consequence. Which was a monumental task. But the particular issue you are asking about, i dont know of any state o
Live from it. Einstein once said, if you want your children to be intelligent, read them fairytales. If you want your children to be more intelligent, read them more fairytales. Its one of the reasons ive taken to writing childrens books, to give children an opportunity to explore that thing called their imagination, from the time that theyre just little boys and little girls. And what i have in my imagination is a donotdisturb sign, and its like mentally inside, ive placed that in there, i do not, anyone to disturb or try to change around anything that i have placed in there about what is possible for me. So you never want to place into your imagination any thought that you would not want to materialize. You never want to allow in your imagination to be contaminated by the way life used to be. Your imagination is yours. Dont let any other people influence you. Never allow peoples ideas about what is possible or impossible for you to occupy your imagination. Ive called it, throughout m