dangerous people. what is different in america is that it is easy to get your hands on a gun. a last of us know this. the politics are difficult. as we saw again this spring. that is where the resignation comes from, the science our politics are frozen and that nothing will change. i cannot accept that. i do not accept we cannot find a common sense way to preserve our traditions including our basic second amendment freedoms and the rights of law-abiding gun owners and reducing the gun violence that unleashes so much mayhem on a regular basis. it may not happen tomorrow or next week or next month but it will happen. it is the change we need. it is a change overwhelmingly
longer the debate goes on, i think some are hoping the less focus and attention it will get from the public. right. and julian, compromise aside, this is far from a kumbaya moment for the congress. i mean, the nra wants it that way after an earlier statement which was perceived by them as a bit of a hedge. they released another much harsher one. let me read this to you, julian. the nra is unequivocally opposed to s-649. in addition the nra will oppose any amendments offered to s-649 that restrict fundamental second amendment freedoms. this includes the misguided compromise proposal drafted by senators joe manchin, pat toomey, and chuck schumer. votes on all anti-gun amendments or proposals will be considered in nra s future candidate evaluations. if that is not a warning shot across the bows, i don t know
issue. have the nra sitting there, which then confirms exactly what we ve been hearing about what happened two nights ago. while it was clear from the outset the nra would not support the bill, the question was, would they oppose it? well, now we ve got an answer. being at the table did not stop the nra from releasing this letter it sent to senators after dinner last night. the nra is unequivocally opposed to s. 649. in addition, the nra will oppose any amendments offered to. 649 that restrict fundamental second amendment freedoms, this includes the misguided compromise proposal drafted by joe manchin, pat toomey, and chuck schumer. votes on all anti-gun amendments or proposals will be considered in nra s future candidate evaluations. they say they were technically not opposing the bill, just calling it misguided, and said
america. i think that is horrible way to look at people who are trying to exercise the second amendment freedoms but think about the single mother that lives in a rough neighborhood and wants to protect her children. the young man or lady that works a night shift and they want to be take care of themselves. the elderly couple that live in a rough neighborhood and want to protect themselves. she is saying to them, you really don t have a right to own that weapon. you are part of the responsibility of gun violence across this country. that is horrible thought process. eric: colonel, are your good friend, debbie wasserman schultz will she be able to mobilize the democrats on this? i don t think you can mobilize the democrats on this. what this is circular means why we go after gun ownership. what is worse, eric, this is part of the precedent and fallout from the supreme court
with them or not. but these are not laws. who determines they re not laws? the president by executive order, that is not a law. what i am saying is here, these restrictio restrictions, especially not in our constitution but guaranteed rights and liberties for our second amendment freedoms. tell me how these orders violate constitutional freedom. well, many of these orders, there s 23 as you pointed out. well, grif me one of them. what the president is talking a and now president finestein is embodying, and this is the right approach to talk. well, most americans would