couldn t that have been worked out, couldn t there have been a deal made? i think what happened is these two things intersected, crashed in his head in that arcade. ultimately what is disturbing about it honestly is they are such two separate questions. the civil war as william suard said was an irrepressible conflict, we could not endure as lincoln pointed out, half slave and half free. there were attempts at compromise. and lincoln was willing, after he became president after he was elected in the winter of 1860 in what was called the secession election of 60-61. he was going to led let slavery remain in the south
jackson and jackson s legacy, which i m pretty sure he began contemplating after the election when steve bannon mentioned him as a jacksonian figure. with me last may, he brought up the question last may, why was the civil war inevitable, couldn t that have been worked out, couldn t there have been a deal made? i think what happened is these two things intersected, crashed in his head in that arcade. ultimately what is disturbing about it honestly is they are such two separate questions. the civil war as william suard said was an irrepressible conflict, we could not endure as lincoln pointed out, half slave and half free. there were attempts at compromise. and lincoln was willing, after he became president after he was elected in the winter of 1860 in what was called the secession election of 60-61.
the civil war as william suard said was an irrepressible conflict, we could not endure as lincoln pointed out, half slave and half free. there were attempts at compromise. and lincoln was willing, after he became president after he was elected in the winter of 1860 in what was called the secession election of 60-61. he was going to led let slavery remain in the south where it was. he drew a line at letting it expand westward. but the civil war was the continued existence of and possible expansion of slavery was the way of trying to avoid the civil war. eugene, choosing this