Chris Hayes discusses the days top news. Publication insisting that gucifer had nothing to do with russia. He was bolstering a Russian Disinformation Campaign designed to cover up a russian attack on the United States. That is what roger stone was doing in the summer of 2016. To be the status of mueller and agalarov. They are his business partners. It is emins idea to bring ms. Universe to moscow. And a deal is cut. And agalarov. Leverage. Agalarov has leverage here. Emin wants something. He has wanted to be big in the United States. He is a middle level pop star and son of an oligarch so that has helped his music career. One of the reasons he linked up to the contest is he was hoping to make it big. And being part of that event will help. He has one coming up in a couple of months so if he wants to retain the ability to perform in the United States that is a point of leverage that mueller will have on him and his father has interest here too. Does that square with what you have been r
the top. it s going to take the president a little bit here to really warm up. he s bringing other people on stage. stay with us here, steve, because we could have more insults hurled just across the state to a secertain former vic president. mike and hans setting the stang there in iowa. thank you for that. and we re going to keep listening to both of those events, bring you any news as it happens. amid biden s attacks and ominous new polls for the trump campaign, i m joined by the director of strategic communications for president trump s 2020 campaign, mark lotter. we mentioned it a ming out ago. we showed the president saying, hey, he s looking at all the democratic candidates, biden, he says, is the one he wants to run against. newest poll out today and it s not the first one to show this, shows, this is from quinnipiac, biden 13 points ahead of the president. 53% to 40% in this poll. other polls also show biden significantly ahead of the president and doing better than the othe
it is a whole mess of ugly things. and i think as far as sarah huck by sanders is concerned, not all that important. what do you expect her to say? she s been a mouthpiece for donald trump and i would say she s an apologist for him but she never apologizes. her job is to marginally make his outrages seem less outrageous. she is very bad at that as well. but kind of, duh, of course she said that, or more to the point, of course she refused to walk back his hideous allegation. you know, he made some clarifying tweet which is not even worth getting into about fake news. what struck me is that there is a secertain, something i feel worried about getting pulled into. the desire on the part of white house to make the press into the opposition and calls at this
some of your colleagues have testified that our surveillance programs are critical, vital, indispensable to our national security doch security. do you agree with their assessments? speaking generally, yes, some of those programs are vital to our national security. do you believe there is is a tacit agreement between the american people and their government that they will allow us secertain powers for guardin the privacy of the information collected? i think there is certainly an expectation that would be a protection of privacy as the government carries out its responsibilities, yes. and you and i discussed some of those privacy protections, even within the intelligence community, as it relates to u.s. persons and you re been very clear this morning. in fact, i ve noted that the times you said u.s. persons. you could have inserted a name but you did not. you had the discipline to say u.s. person. that discipline is practiced throughout the intelligence
best supreme court justices we ve ever had. so that one backfired. are you surprise, eugene? i mean, all you did was call attention to the fact that people were losing what was a low-cost, low-benefit, but low-cost insurance benefit but will have to pay a lot more under secertain insurance plans and the disdain for your attempts? actually, i m not surprised at all. there s very little tolerance at bowie state university for any type of thought that was jououte the mainstream thought. i can give you a couple examples. last semester my organization, we hosted united states senator tim scott on campus. we had zero attendance from the administration. but they were very willing to befriend a senator for both louis farrakhan and angela davis. wow. do you feel like that is sort of built into their approach in the classes? you know, the atmosphere on campus? because it feels like a form of brainwashing to just shut down