mueller wanted to talk to, and he submitted answered questions in writing. so this president did nothing to stop mueller from finding the truth. sean: if you go back, i mentioned to jay sekulow, the nine and a half minute press conference he did, and boy, the media was so quick, they thought conspiracy theory came back to life. it s serious and significant, though. i watched it, and number one, i knew he had said the opposite, waiting for people to catch up, and number two, when you think about i thought attorney general barr was being very gracious to the special counsel, threw him a lifeline. they released a joint statement basically saying i didn t mean what i said for nine and a half minutes. that ought to be very troublesome robert mueller. right. but i hope people understand what you re talking about, because when mueller came in to tell barr that he could decide, he could make the decision about
just guessing, you probably know a lot about what is very possibly going to break tomorrow. one, they let you get without revealing sources, not ready, but it is very clear is coming. it goes back if i or member correctly, to this show, and you and sara carter in march of 2017. that s exactly right. if you remember, that is when we began reporting on the market increase in the 2016 election in unmaskings by the obama administration, and eventually we learned that samantha power, the u.n. ambassador, was the unmasking in chief, making hundreds of request to take the names of americans that are supposed to be redacted intelligence reports, and on unmasking the names. tonight, have these documents and i m going to prove, sean, these are the official emails samantha power, and what i can report is that samantha power has the same sort of anti-trump bias in her government emails that we have saw with pete strauch and lisa page at the fbi.
that s a broad mandate. that s a pretty far stretch. the taxi medallions? okay, whatever. that was a broad mandate. but you are not going to deal with the russian dossier that is unverifiable, that was used to spy on, let s see, the opposition party, and then the transition, and then the president of the united states of america? how did he miss that little detail? oh, he didn t miss the detail, in my opinion, he just chose not to bring it out, because it hurt the case. and he is going to have to answer to all of that, and he is going to have some really, really tough questions sean: did you think when you wash them for the nine and a half minutes, i almost felt he had not read i felt he was reading it for the first time. he was stumbling all over the place. i didn t know what some of the author wrote, i didn t know what to think. what did you think? on their five seconds, ten seconds. i think he thought he was a smart man who is going to get away with it.
so we want to figure out why the double standard? secrecy in terms of the government accountability, but they re willing to let these guys who have records of corruption, as you point out, go out and say whatever they want about meetings with the president and things like that, that typically we would have to sue for under the freedom of information act, and we probably wouldn t get. sean: yeah. what is really important is the freedom of veneration last night, the american center for law and justice, what they discovered, my little birdies are telling me that we might get a lot more information as it relates to unmasking, surveillance, all of these things all the things we talked about almost from the beginning, march of 2017 peered what do you see on the horizon for you? you know, the question is, is is the fbi going to continue to stonewall documents about what andrew mccabe was texting about, what strzok and paige were texting about. and the fbi also has been forced by a cou
they were investigating trump, and they were railing against him in their official government emails and text messages. i can tell you that samantha power and her colleagues were doing the same thing on the official state email system, and when you see her tomorrow, what she was saying about trump at the same time the unmaskings were going on, i m sure it s going to trouble the american public. sean: let s go back to the american center for law and justice yesterday, their report. and get your reaction, how big a piece to the puzzle is that? because executive order 12333, again, this program, we saw this as a big issue in 2017. now that we have discovered a rigged investigation, we also saw an effort to use a phony russian dossier not verified to influence and election, leaked by intel people to influence the election, russian disinformation, as the new york times suspects, and then it went further in terms of being used as the bulk of information just by, not just